An independent executive agency is created by Congress to address concerns that go beyond the scope of ordinary legislation. These agencies are responsible for keeping the government and the economy running smoothly. These agencies are not represented in the cabinet and are not part of the Executive Office of the president. They deal with government operations, the economy, and regulatory oversight.
President Dwight D. Eisenhower established the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in 1958 with a distinctly civilian (rather than military) orientation encouraging peaceful applications in space science. The National Aeronautics and Space Act was passed on July 29, 1958, disestablishing NASA's predecessor, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA). The new agency became operational on October 1, 1958.
Since that time, most U.S. space exploration efforts have been led by NASA, including the Apollo moon-landing missions, the Skylab space station, and later the Space Shuttle. Currently, NASA is supporting the International Space Station and is overseeing the development of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, the Space Launch System and Commercial Crew vehicles. The agency is also responsible for the Launch Services Program (LSP), which provides oversight of launch operations and countdown management for unmanned NASA launches. The organizational structure of NASA is shown in the following chart.
Video: The 50th Anniversary of NASA (2008)
Important NASA Contributions
Beginning in the last half of the 20th century and continuing today, the research and exploration efforts of NASA have contributed to discovery and development of many important technological innovations.
Health and Medicine
Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs): Red light-emitting diodes are growing plants in space and healing humans on Earth. The LED technology used in NASA space shuttle plant growth experiments has contributed to the development of medical devices such as award-winning WARP 10, a hand-held, high-intensity, LED unit developed by Quantum Devices Inc. The WARP 10 is intended for the temporary relief of minor muscle and joint pain, arthritis, stiffness, and muscle spasms, and also promotes muscle relaxation and increases local blood circulation. The WARP 10 is being used by the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Navy as a noninvasive “soldier self-care” device that aids front-line forces with first aid for minor injuries and pain, thereby improving endurance in combat. The next-generation WARP 75 has been used to relieve pain in bone marrow transplant patients, and will be used to combat the symptoms of bone atrophy, multiple sclerosis, diabetic complications, Parkinson’s disease, and in a variety of ocular applications. (Spinoff 2005, 2008)
Infrared ear thermometers: Diatek Corporation and NASA developed an aural thermometer, which weighs only 8 ounces and uses infrared astronomy technology to measure the amount of energy emitted by the eardrum, the same way the temperature of stars and planets is measured. This method avoids contact with mucous membranes, virtually eliminating the possibility of cross infection, and permits rapid temperature measurement of newborn, critically-ill, or incapacitated patients. NASA supported the Diatek Corporation, a world leader in electronic thermometry, through the Technology Affiliates Program. (Spinoff 1991)
Artificial limbs: NASA’s continued funding, coupled with its collective innovations in robotics and shock-absorption/comfort materials are inspiring and enabling the private sector to create new and better solutions for animal and human prostheses. Advancements such as Environmental Robots Inc.’s development of artificial muscle systems with robotic sensing and actuation capabilities for use in NASA space robotic and extravehicular activities are being adapted to create more functionally dynamic artificial limbs (Spinoff 2004). Additionally, other private-sector adaptations of NASA’s temper foam technology have brought about custom-moldable materials offering the natural look and feel of flesh, as well as preventing friction between the skin and the prosthesis, and heat/moisture buildup. (Spinoff 2005)
Ventricular assist device: Collaboration between NASA, Dr. Michael DeBakey, Dr. George Noon, and MicroMed Technology Inc. resulted in a lifesaving heart pump for patients awaiting heart transplants. The MicroMed DeBakey ventricular assist device (VAD) functions as a “bridge to heart transplant” by pumping blood throughout the body to keep critically ill patients alive until a donor heart is available. Weighing less than four ounces and measuring one by three inches, the pump is approximately one-tenth the size of other currently marketed pulsatile VADs. This makes it less invasive and ideal for smaller adults and children. Because of the pump’s small size, less than 5 percent of the patients implanted developed device-related infections. It can operate up to 8 hours on batteries, giving patients the mobility to do normal, everyday activities. (Spinoff 2002)
Airplane anti-icing systems: NASA funding under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program and work with NASA scientists advanced the development of the certification and integration of a thermoelectric deicing system called Thermawing, a DC-powered air conditioner for single-engine aircraft called Thermacool, and high-output alternators to run them both. Thermawing, a reliable anti-icing and deicing system, allows pilots to safely fly through ice encounters and provides pilots of single-engine aircraft the heated wing technology usually reserved for a larger, jet-powered craft. Thermacool, an innovative electric air conditioning system, uses a new compressor whose rotary pump design runs off an energy-efficient, brushless DC motor and allows pilots to use the air conditioner before the engine even starts. (Spinoff 2007)
Grooves in concrete: Safety grooving, the cutting of grooves in concrete to increase traction and prevent injury, was first developed to reduce aircraft accidents on wet runways. Represented by the International Grooving and Grinding Association, the industry expanded into highway and pedestrian applications. The technique originated at Langley Research Center, which assisted in testing the grooving at airports and on highways. Skidding was reduced, stopping distance decreased, and a vehicle’s cornering ability on curves was increased. The process has been extended to animal holding pens, steps, parking lots, and other potentially slippery surfaces. (Spinoff 1985)
Radial tires: Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company developed a fibrous material, five times stronger than steel, for NASA to use in parachute shrouds to soft-land the Vikings on the Martian surface. The fiber’s chain-like molecular structure gave it incredible strength in proportion to its weight. Recognizing the increased strength and durability of the material, Goodyear expanded the technology and went on to produce a new radial tire with a tread life expected to be 10,000 miles greater than conventional radials. (Spinoff 1976)
Chemical detection: NASA contracted with Intelligent Optical Systems (IOS) to develop moisture- and pH-sensitive sensors to warn of potentially dangerous corrosive conditions in aircraft before significant structural damage occurs. This new type of sensor, using a specially manufactured optical fiber whose entire length is chemically sensitive, changes color in response to contact with its target. After completing the work with NASA, IOS was tasked by the U.S. Department of Defense to further develop the sensors for detecting chemical warfare agents and potential threats, such as toxic industrial compounds and nerve agents, for which they proved just as successful. IOS has additionally sold the chemically sensitive fiber optic cables to major automotive and aerospace companies, who are finding a variety of uses for the devices such as aiding experimentation with nontraditional power sources, and as an economical “alarm system” for detecting chemical release in large facilities. (Spinoff 2007)
Video enhancing and analysis systems: Integraph Government Solutions developed its Video Analyst System (VAS) by building on Video Image Stabilization and Registration (VISAR) technology created by NASA to help FBI agents analyze video footage. Originally used for enhancing video images from nighttime videotapes made with hand-held camcorders, VAS is a state-of-the-art, simple, effective, and affordable tool for video enhancement and analysis offering benefits such as support of full-resolution digital video, stabilization, frame-by-frame analysis, conversion of analog video to digital storage formats, and increased visibility of filmed subjects without altering underlying footage. Aside from law enforcement and security applications, VAS has also been adapted to serve the military for reconnaissance, weapons deployment, damage assessment, training, and mission debriefing. (Spinoff 2001)
Land mine removal device: Due to arrangements such as the one between Thiokol Propulsion and NASA that permits Thiokol to use NASA’s surplus rocket fuel to produce a flare that can safely destroy land mines, NASA is able to reduce propellant waste without negatively impacting the environment, and Thiokol is able to access the materials needed to develop the Demining Device flare. The Demining Device flare uses a battery-triggered electric match to ignite and neutralize land mines in the field without detonation. The flare uses solid rocket fuel to burn a hole in the mine’s case and burn away the explosive contents so the mine can be disarmed without hazard. (Spinoff 2000)
Fire-resistant insulation over steel: Built and designed by Avco Corporation, the Apollo heat shield was coated with a material whose purpose was to burn and thus dissipate energy during reentry while charring, to form a protective coating to block heat penetration. NASA subsequently funded Avco’s development of other applications of the heat shield, such as fire-retardant paints and foams for aircraft, which led to the world’s first intumescent epoxy material, which expands in volume when exposed to heat or flames, acting as an insulating barrier and dissipating heat through burn-off. Further innovations based on this product include steel coatings devised to make high-rise buildings and public structures safer by swelling to provide a tough and stable insulating layer over the steel for up to four hours of fire protection, ultimately to slow building collapse and provide more time for escape. (Spinoff 2006)
Firefighter gear: Firefighting equipment widely used throughout the United States is based on a NASA development that coupled Agency design expertise with lightweight materials developed for the U.S. Space Program. A project that linked NASA and the National Bureau of Standards resulted in a lightweight breathing system including a face mask, frame, harness, and air bottle, using an aluminum composite material developed by NASA for use on rocket casings. Aerospace technology has been beneficially transferred to civil-use applications for years, but perhaps the broadest fire-related technology transfer is the breathing apparatus worn by firefighters for protection from smoke inhalation injury. Additionally, radio communications are essential during a fire to coordinate hose lines, rescue victims, and otherwise increase efficiency and safety. NASA’s inductorless electronic circuit technology contributed to the development of a lower-cost, more rugged, short-range two-way radio now used by firefighters. NASA also helped develop a specialized mask weighing less than three ounces to protect the physically impaired from injuries to the face and head, as well as flexible, heat-resistant materials—developed to protect the space shuttle on reentry—which are being used both by the military and commercially in suits for municipal and aircraft-rescue firefighters. (Spinoff 1976)
Consumer, Home, and Recreation
Temper foam: As the result of a program designed to develop a padding concept to improve crash protection for airplane passengers, Ames Research Center developed a foam material with unusual properties. The material is widely used and commonly known as temper foam or “memory foam.” The material has been incorporated into a host of widely used and recognized products including mattresses, pillows, military and civilian aircraft, automobiles and motorcycles, sports safety equipment, amusement park rides and arenas, horseback saddles, archery targets, furniture, and human and animal prostheses. Its high-energy absorption and soft characteristics not only offer superior protection in the event of an accident or impact but enhanced comfort and support for passengers on long flights or those seeking restful sleep. Today, temper foam is being employed by NASCAR to provide added safety in racecars. (Spinoff 1976, 1977, 1979, 1988, 1995, 2002, 2005)
Enriched Baby Food/Baby bottle: Commercially available infant formulas now contain a nutritional enrichment ingredient that traces its existence to NASA-sponsored research that explored the potential of algae as a recycling agent for long-duration space travel. The substance, formulated into the products life’s DHA and life’s ARA, can be found in over 90 percent of the infant formulas sold in the United States, and are added to the infant formulas sold in more than 65 additional countries. The products were developed and are manufactured by Martek Biosciences Corporation, which has pioneered the commercial development of products based on microalgae; the company’s founders and principal scientists acquired their expertise in this area while working on the NASA program. (Spinoff 1996, 2008)
Portable Cordless Vacuums: Apollo and Gemini space mission technologies created by Black & Decker have helped change the way we clean around the house. For the Apollo space mission, NASA required a portable, self-contained drill capable of extracting core samples from below the lunar surface. Black & Decker was tasked with the job and developed a computer program to optimize the design of the drill’s motor and insure minimal power consumption. That computer program led to the development of a cordless miniature vacuum cleaner called the Dustbuster. (Spinoff 1981)
Freeze dried food technology: In planning for the long-duration Apollo missions, NASA conducted extensive research into space food. One of the techniques developed was freeze drying—Action Products commercialized this technique, concentrating on snack food. The foods are cooked, quickly frozen, and then slowly heated in a vacuum chamber to remove the ice crystals formed by the freezing process. The final product retains 98 percent of its nutrition and weighs only 20 percent of its original weight. Today, one of the benefits of this advancement in food preparation includes simple nutritious meals available to handicapped and otherwise homebound senior adults unable to take advantage of existing meal programs sponsored by government and private organizations. (Spinoff 1976, 1994)
Environmental and Agricultural Resources
Silicon solar power cells: Homes across the country are now being outfitted with modern, high-performance, low-cost, single crystal silicon solar power cells that allow them to reduce their traditional energy expenditures and contribute to pollution reduction. The advanced technology behind these solar devices—which are competitively-priced and provide up to 50 percent more power than conventional solar cells—originated with the efforts of a NASA-sponsored 28-member coalition of companies, government groups, universities, and nonprofits forming the Environmental Research Aircraft and Sensor Technology (ERAST) Alliance. ERAST’s goal was to foster the development of remotely piloted aircraft intended to fly unmanned at high altitudes for days at a time, requiring advanced solar power sources that did not add weight. As a result, SunPower Corporation created the most advanced silicon-based cells available for terrestrial or airborne applications. (Spinoff 2005)
A product using NASA’s microencapsulating technology is available to consumers and industry enabling them to safely and permanently clean petroleum-based pollutants from water. The microencapsulated wonder, Petroleum Remediation Product or “PRP,” has revolutionized the way oil spills are cleaned. The basic technology behind PRP is thousands of microcapsules—tiny balls of beeswax with hollow centers. Water cannot penetrate the microcapsule’s cell, but oil is absorbed right into the beeswax spheres as they float on the water’s surface. Contaminating chemical compounds that originally come from crude oil (such as fuels, motor oils, or petroleum hydrocarbons) are caught before they settle, limiting damage to ocean beds. (Spinoff 1994, 2006)
Water purification: NASA engineers are collaborating with qualified companies to develop a complex system of devices intended to sustain the astronauts living on the International Space Station and, in the future, those who go on to explore the Moon. This system, tentatively scheduled for launch in 2008, will make use of available resources by turning wastewater from respiration, sweat, and urine into drinkable water. Commercially, this system is benefiting people all over the world who need affordable, clean water. By combining the benefits of chemical adsorption, ion exchange, and ultra-filtration processes, products using this technology yield safe, drinkable water from the most challenging sources, such as in underdeveloped regions where well water may be heavily contaminated. (Spinoff 1995, 2006)
Better Software: From real-time weather visualization and forecasting, high-resolution 3-D maps of the Moon and Mars, to real-time tracking of the International Space Station and the space shuttle, NASA is collaborating with Google Inc. to solve a variety of challenging technical problems ranging from large-scale data management and massively distributed computing, to human-computer interfaces—with the ultimate goal of making the vast, scattered ocean of data more accessible and usable. With companies like InterSense, NASA continues to fund and collaborate on other software advancement initiatives benefiting such areas as photo/video image enhancement, virtual-reality/design, simulation training, and medical applications. (Spinoff 2005)
Computer-generated car modeling/structural analysis software: NASA software engineers have created thousands of computer programs over the decades equipped to design, test, and analyze stress, vibration, and acoustical properties of a broad assortment of aerospace parts and structures (before prototyping even begins). The NASA Structural Analysis Program, or NASTRAN, is considered one of the most successful and widely-used NASA software programs. It has been used to design everything from Cadillacs to roller coaster rides. Originally created for spacecraft design, NASTRAN has been employed in a host of non-aerospace applications and is available to industry through NASA’s Computer Software Management and Information Center (COSMIC). COSMIC maintains a library of computer programs from NASA and other government agencies and offers them for sale at a fraction of the cost of developing a new program, benefiting companies around the world seeking to solve the largest, most difficult engineering problems. (Spinoff 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1998)
Internet-connected technology applications: Embedded Web Technology (EWT) software—originally developed by NASA for use by astronauts operating experiments on available laptops from anywhere on the International Space Station—lets a user monitor and/or control a device remotely over the Internet. NASA supplied this technology and guidance to TMIO LLC, who went on to develop a low-cost, real-time remote control and monitoring of a new intelligent oven product named “ConnectIo.” With combined cooling and heating capabilities, ConnectIo provides the convenience of being able to store cold food where it will remain properly refrigerated until a customized pre-programmable cooking cycle begins. The menu allows the user to simply enter the dinner time, and the oven automatically switches from refrigeration to the cooking cycle, so that the meal will be ready as the family arrives home for dinner. (Spinoff 2005)
Powdered lubricants: NASA’s scientists developed a solid lubricant coating material that is saving the manufacturing industry millions of dollars. Developed as a shaft coating to be deposited by thermal spraying to protect foil air bearings used in oil-free turbomachinery, like gas turbines, this advanced coating, PS300, was meant to be part of a larger project: an oil-free aircraft engine capable of operating at high temperatures with increased reliability, lowered weight, reduced maintenance, and increased power. PS300 improves efficiency, lowers friction, reduces emissions, and has been used by NASA in advanced aeropropulsion engines, refrigeration compressors, turbochargers, and hybrid electrical turbogenerators. ADMA Products has found widespread industrial applications for the material. (Spinoff 2005)
Tension and high-pressure monitoring for mine safety: An ultrasonic bolt elongation monitor developed by a NASA scientist for testing tension and high-pressure loads on bolts and fasteners has continued to evolve over the past three decades. Today, the same scientist and Luna Innovations are using a digital adaptation of this same device for a plethora of different applications, including non-destructive evaluation of railroad ties, groundwater analysis, radiation dosimetry, and as a medical testing device to assess levels of internal swelling and pressure for patients suffering from intracranial pressure and compartment syndrome, a painful condition that results when pressure within muscles builds to dangerous levels. The applications for this device continue to expand. (Spinoff 1978, 2005, 2008)
Food safety systems: Faced with the problem of how and what to feed an astronaut in a sealed capsule under weightless conditions while planning for human space flight, NASA enlisted the aid of the Pillsbury Company to address two principal concerns: eliminating crumbs of food that might contaminate the spacecraft’s atmosphere and sensitive instruments, and assuring absolute freedom from potentially catastrophic disease-producing bacteria and toxins. Pillsbury developed the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) concept, potentially one of the most far-reaching space spinoffs, to address NASA’s second concern. HACCP is designed to prevent food safety problems rather than to catch them after they have occurred. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has applied HACCP guidelines for the handling of seafood, juice, and dairy products. (Spinoff 1991)
For more information on NASA’s technological contributions, check out the following Internet resources:
Video: 25 NASA Discoveries that Changed Your Life
DEBATE ACTIVITY - THE FUTURE OF NASA
Recently, there has been a call to radically change the overall mission of NASA and reduce or eliminate its manned space flight missions. Cutting NASA's annual funding would result in at least $17 billion per year in annual savings. Is this a wise fiscal policy decision? Explain your answer using evidence from online resources and articles including the links provided below.
Unlike independent executive agencies like NASA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and others like it act as regulatory agencies in order to implement and enforce specific Congressional laws. Other regulatory agencies that we will examine in this section include the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Each of these agencies acts independently and reports directly to Congress for oversight and funding. In addition, these agencies have tremendous police and law enforcement powers, which accompany the Congressional statutes they are charged to enforce.
The Environmental Protection Agency
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or sometimes USEPA) is an agency of the U.S. federal government, which was created for the purpose of protecting human health and the environment by writing and enforcing regulations based on laws passed by Congress. The EPA was proposed by President Richard Nixon and began operation on December 2, 1970, after Nixon signed an executive order. The order establishing the EPA was ratified by committee hearings in the House and Senate. The agency is led by its administrator, who is appointed by the president and approved by Congress. The current administrator is Gina McCarthy. The EPA is not a cabinet department, but the administrator is normally given cabinet rank.
The EPA has its headquarters in Washington, D.C., regional offices for each of the agency's 10 regions, and 27 laboratories. The agency conducts environmental assessment, research, and education. It has the responsibility of maintaining and enforcing national standards under a variety of environmental laws, in consultation with state, tribal, and local governments. It delegates some permitting, monitoring, and enforcement responsibility to U.S. states and the federally recognized tribes. EPA enforcement powers include fines, sanctions, and other measures. The agency also works with industries and all levels of government in a wide variety of voluntary pollution prevention programs and energy conservation efforts.
The agency has approximately 15,193 full-time employees and engages many more people on a contractual basis. More than half of EPA human resources are engineers, scientists, and environmental protection specialists; other groups include legal, public affairs, financial, and information technologists.
The EPA oversees a number of important programs and enforces a great number of federal statutes regarding the quality of air, water, and soil in the United States. Some of its most important and most highly visible programs include:
Energy Star: In 1992 the EPA launched the Energy Star program, a voluntary program that fosters energy efficiency.
Pesticide oversight and regulation: The EPA administers the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (which is much older than the agency) and registers all pesticides legally sold in the United States.
Environmental Impact Statement Review: EPA is responsible for reviewing Environmental Impact Statements of other federal agencies' projects, under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Safer Detergents Stewardship Initiative: Through the Safer Detergents Stewardship Initiative (SDSI),  EPA's Design for the Environment (DfE) recognizes environmental leaders who voluntarily commit to the use of safer surfactants. Safer surfactants are the ones that break down quickly to non-polluting compounds and help protect aquatic life in both fresh and salt water.
The Design for the Environment has identified safer alternative surfactants through partnerships with industry and environmental advocates. These safer alternatives are comparable in cost and are readily available. CleanGredients is a source of safer surfactants.
Fuel economy: Manufacturers selling automobiles in the USA are required to provide EPA fuel economy test results for their vehicles and the manufacturers are not allowed to provide results from alternate sources. The fuel economy is calculated using the emissions data collected during two of the vehicle's Clean Air Act certification tests by measuring the total volume of carbon captured from the exhaust during the tests.
The current testing system was originally developed in 1972 and used driving cycles designed to simulate driving during rush-hour in Los Angeles during that era. Prior to 1984, the EPA reported the exact fuel economy figures calculated from the test. In 1984, the EPA began adjusting city (aka Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule or UDDS) results downward by 10% and highway (aka HighWay Fuel Economy Test or HWFET) results by 22% to compensate for changes in driving conditions since 1972 and to better correlate the EPA test results with real-world driving. In 1996, the EPA proposed updating the Federal Testing Procedure to add a new higher speed test (US06) and an air-conditioner test (SC03) to further improve the correlation of fuel economy and emission estimates with real-world reports. The updated testing methodology was finalized in December, 2006 for implementation with model year 2008 vehicles and set the precedent of a 12-year review cycle for the test procedures.
In February 2005, the organization launched a program called "Your MPG" that allows drivers to add real-world fuel economy statistics into a database on the EPA's fuel economy website and compare them with others and the original EPA test results.
It is important to note that the EPA actually conducts these tests on very few vehicles. "While the public mistakenly presumes that this federal agency is hard at work conducting complicated tests on every new model of truck, van, car, and SUV, in reality, just 18 of the EPA's 17,000 employees work in the automobile-testing department in Ann Arbor, Michigan, examining 200 to 250 vehicles a year, or roughly 15 percent of new models. As to that other 85 percent, the EPA takes automakers at their word—without any testing-accepting submitted results as accurate." Two-thirds of the vehicles the EPA tests themselves are selected randomly, and the remaining third are tested for specific reasons.
Although originally created as a reference point for fossil fuelled vehicles, driving cycles have been used for estimating how many miles an electric vehicle will do on a single charge. 
Air quality: The Air Quality Modeling Group (AQMG) is in the EPA's Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) and provides leadership and direction on the full range of air quality models, air pollution dispersion models and other mathematical simulation techniques used in assessing pollution control strategies and the impacts of air pollution sources.
The AQMG serves as the focal point on air pollution modeling techniques for other EPA headquarters staff, EPA regional Offices, and State and local environmental agencies. It coordinates with the EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD) on the development of new models and techniques, as well as wider issues of atmospheric research. Finally, the AQMG conducts modeling analyses to support the policy and regulatory decisions of the EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS).
Oil pollution: SPCC: Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Rule. Applies to all facilities that store, handle, process, gather, transfer, store, refine, distribute, use or consume oil or oil products. Oil products include petroleum and non-petroleum oils as well as: animal fats, oils and greases; fish and marine mammal oils; and vegetable oils, (including oils from seeds, nuts, fruits, and kernels). Mandates that a written plan is required for facilities that store more than 1,320 gallons of fuel above ground or more than 42,000 gallons below-ground, and may reasonably be expected to discharge to navigable waters(as defined in the Clean Water Act)or adjoining shorelines. Secondary Containment mandated at oil storage facilities. Oil release containment is required at oil development sites.
WaterSense: is an EPA program designed to encourage water efficiency in the United States through the use of a special label on consumer products. It was launched in June 2006. Products include high-efficiency toilets (HETs), bathroom sink faucets (and accessories), and irrigation equipment. WaterSense is a voluntary program, with EPA developing specifications for water-efficient products through a public process and product testing by independent laboratories. 
Drinking water: The EPA ensures safe drinking water for the public, by setting standards for more than 160,000 public water systems throughout the United States. EPA oversees states, local governments, and water suppliers to enforce the standards, under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The program includes regulation of injection wells in order to protect underground sources of drinking water. Select readings of amounts of certain contaminants in drinking water, precipitation, and surface water, in addition to milk and air, are reported on EPA's Rad Net web site in a section entitled Envirofacts. In certain cases, readings exceeding EPA MCL levels are deleted or not included despite mandatory reporting regulations. A draft of revised EPA regulations relaxes the regulations for radiation exposure through drinking water, stating that current standards are impractical to enforce. The EPA is recommending that intervention is not necessary until drinking water is contaminated with radioactive iodine 131 at a concentration of 81,000 picocuries per liter (the limit for short term exposure set by the International Atomic Energy Agency), which is 27,000 times the current EPA limit of 3 picocuries per liter for long-term exposure. 
Radiation protection: The EPA has the following seven project groups to protect the public from radiation. These include:
- Radioactive Waste Management
- Emergency Preparedness and Response Programs
- Protective Action Guides and Planning Guidance for Radiological Incidents. EPA developed the manual to provide guidelines for local and state governments to protect the public from a nuclear accident.
- EPA Cleanup and Multi-Agency Program.
- Risk Assessment and Federal Guidance Programs 
- Naturally-Occurring Radioactive Materials Program 
- Air and Water Programs 
- Radiation Source Reduction and Management 
Research Vessel (OSV Bold): On March 3, 2004, the United States Navy transferred USNS Bold, a Stalwart class ocean surveillance ship, to the EPA, now known as OSV Bold. The ship, previously used in anti-submarine operations during the Cold War, is equipped with side-scan sonar, underwater video, water and sediment sampling instruments, used in the study of ocean and coastline. One of the major missions of the Bold was to monitor for ecological impact sites where materials are dumped from dredging operations in U.S. ports.  In 2013, the Bold was awarded to Seattle Central Community College (SCCC) by the General Services Administration. SCCC demonstrated in a competition that they would put it to the highest and best purpose, and acquired the ship at a cost of $5,000. 
Advance identification: Advance identification, or ADID, is a planning process used by the EPA to identify wetlands and other bodies of water and their respective suitability for the discharge of dredged and fill material. The EPA conducts the process in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and local states or Native American Tribes. As of February 1993, 38 ADID projects had been completed and 33 were ongoing. 
Superfund: Superfund is the federal government's program to clean up the nation's uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Those sites that are so dangerous as to be placed on the “National Priorities List” are overseen and monitored intensely and are cleaned up to protect the environment and the health of all Americans.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
OSHA is an agency of the United States Department of Labor. Congress established the agency under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which President Richard M. Nixon signed into law on December 29, 1970. OSHA's mission is to "assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women by setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education, and assistance". The agency is also charged with enforcing a variety of whistleblower statutes and regulations. OSHA is currently headed by Assistant Secretary of Labor David Michaels.
OSHA officially formed on April 28, 1971, the date that the OSH Act became effective. George Guenther was appointed as the agency's first director.
Rights and Responsibilities UnderOSHA
Employers have the responsibility to provide a safe workplace. By law, employers must provide their workers with a workplace that does not have serious hazards and must follow all OSHA safety and health standards. Employers must find and correct safety and health problems. OSHA further requires that employers must first try to eliminate or reduce hazards by making feasible changes in working conditions rather than relying on personal protective equipment such as masks, gloves, or earplugs. Switching to safer chemicals, enclosing processes to trap harmful fumes, or using ventilation systems to clean the air are examples of effective ways to eliminate or reduce risks.
Employers must also:
- Inform workers about chemical hazards through training, labels, alarms, color-coded systems, chemical information sheets, and other methods.
- Provide safety training to workers in a language and vocabulary they can understand.
- Keep accurate records of work-related injuries and illnesses.
- Perform tests in the workplace, such as air sampling, required by some OSHA standards.
- Provide required personal protective equipment at no cost to workers. (Employers must pay for most types of required personal protective equipment.)
- Provide hearing exams or other medical tests when required by OSHA standards.
- Post OSHA citations and annually post injury and illness summary data where workers can see them.
- Notify OSHA within eight hours of a workplace fatality. Notify OSHA within 24 hours of all work-related inpatient hospitalizations, all amputations, and all losses of an eye (1-800-321-OSHA ).
- Prominently display the official OSHA Job Safety and Health – It’s the law poster that describes rights and responsibilities under the OSH Act.
- Not retaliate or discriminate against workers for using their rights under the law, including their right to report a work-related injury or illness.
Workers have the right to:
- Working conditions that do not pose a risk of serious harm.
- File a confidential complaint with OSHA to have their workplace inspected.
- Receive information and training about hazards, methods to prevent harm, and the OSHA standards that apply to their workplace. The training must be done in a language and vocabulary workers can understand.
- Receive copies of records of work-related injuries and illnesses that occur in their workplace.
- Receive copies of the results from tests and monitoring done to find and measure hazards in their workplace.
- Receive copies of their workplace medical records.
- Participate in an OSHA inspection and speak in private with the inspector.
- File a complaint with OSHA if they have been retaliated or discriminated against by their employer as the result of requesting an inspection or using any of their other rights under the OSH Act.
- File a complaint if punished or retaliated against for acting as a “whistleblower” under the 21 additional federal laws for which OSHA has jurisdiction.
Temporary workers must be treated like permanent employees. Staffing agencies and host employers share joint accountability over temporary workers. Both entities are therefore bound to comply with workplace health and safety requirements and to ensure worker safety and health. OSHA could hold both the host and temporary employers responsible for the violation of any condition.
Health and Safety Standards
The Occupational Safety and Health Act grants OSHA the authority to issue workplace health and safety regulations. These regulations include limits on hazardous chemical exposure, employee access to hazard information, requirements for the use of personal protective equipment, and requirements to prevent falls and hazards from operating dangerous equipment.
OSHA’s current Construction, General Industry, Maritime and Agriculture standards are designed to protect workers from a wide range of serious hazards. Examples of OSHA standards include requirements for employers to: provide fall protection such as a safety harness/line or guardrails; prevent trenching cave-ins; prevent exposure to some infectious diseases; ensure the safety of workers who enter confined spaces; prevent exposure to harmful chemicals; put guards on dangerous machines; provide respirators or other safety equipment; and provide training for certain dangerous jobs in a language and vocabulary workers can understand.
Employers must also comply with the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act. This clause requires employers to keep their workplaces free of serious recognized hazards and is generally cited when no specific OSHA standard applies to the hazard.
In its first year of operation, OSHA was permitted to adopt regulations based on guidelines set by certain standards organizations, such as the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, without going through all of the requirements of a typical rulemaking. OSHA is granted the authority to promulgate standards that prescribe the methods employers are legally required to follow to protect their workers from hazards. Before OSHA can issue a standard, it must go through a very extensive and lengthy process that includes substantial public engagement, notice, and comment. The agency must show that a significant risk to workers exists and that there are feasible measures employers can take to protect their workers.
In 2000, OSHA issued an ergonomics standard. In March 2001, Congress voted to repeal the standard through the Congressional Review Act. The repeal, one of the first major pieces of legislation signed by President George W. Bush, is the only instance that Congress has successfully used the Congressional Review Act to block a regulation.
OSHA is responsible for enforcing its standards on regulated entities. Compliance Safety and Health Officers carry out inspections and assess fines for regulatory violations. Inspections are planned for worksites in particularly hazardous industries. Inspections can also be triggered by a workplace fatality, multiple hospitalizations, worker complaints, or referrals.
OSHA is a small agency, given the size of its mission: with its state partners, OSHA has approximately 2,400 inspectors covering more than 8 million workplaces where 130 million workers are employed. In Fiscal Year 2012 (ending Sept. 30), OSHA and its state partners conducted more than 83,000 inspections of workplaces across the United States — just a fraction of the nation’s worksites.  According to a report by AFL–CIO, it would take OSHA 129 years to inspect all workplaces under its jurisdiction.
Enforcement plays an important part in OSHA’s efforts to reduce workplace injuries, illnesses, and fatalities. Inspections are initiated without advance notice, conducted using on-site or telephone and facsimile investigations, performed by trained compliance officers and scheduled based on the following priorities [highest to lowest]: imminent danger; catastrophes – fatalities or hospitalizations; worker complaints and referrals; targeted inspections – particular hazards, high injury rates; and follow-up inspections.
Current workers or their representatives may file a complaint and ask OSHA to inspect their workplace if they believe that there is a serious hazard or that their employer is not following OSHA standards. Workers and their representatives have the right to ask for an inspection without OSHA telling their employer who filed the complaint. It is a violation of the OSH Act for an employer to fire, demote, transfer or in any way discriminate against a worker for filing a complaint or using other OSHA rights.
When an inspector finds violations of OSHA standards or serious hazards, OSHA may issue citations and fines. A citation includes methods an employer may use to fix a problem and the date by which the corrective actions must be completed. OSHA’s fines are very low compared with other government agencies. The maximum OSHA fine for a serious violation is $7,000, and the maximum fine for a repeat or willful violation is $70,000. In determining the amount of the proposed penalty, OSHA must take into account the gravity of the alleged violation and the employer’s size of the business, good faith, and history of previous violations. Employers have the right to contest any part of the citation, including whether a violation actually exists. Workers only have the right to challenge the deadline by which a problem must be resolved. Appeals of citations are heard by the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC).
OSHA carries out its enforcement activities through its 10 regional offices and 90 area offices. OSHA’s regional offices are located in Boston, New York City, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City metropolitan area, Denver, San Francisco, and Seattle.
Video: Introduction to OSHA
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA)
The FDA is a federal agency of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, one of the United States federal executive departments. The FDA is responsible for protecting and promoting public health through the regulation and supervision of food safety, tobacco products, dietary supplements, prescription and over-the-counter pharmaceutical drugs (medications), vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, blood transfusions, medical devices, electromagnetic radiation emitting devices (ERED), cosmetics, animal foods & feed and veterinary products.
The FDA was empowered by the United States Congress to enforce the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which serves as the primary focus for the Agency; the FDA also enforces other laws, notably Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and associated regulations, many of which are not directly related to food or drugs. These include regulating lasers, cellular phones, condoms and control of disease on products ranging from certain household pets to sperm donation for assisted reproduction.
The FDA is led by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Commissioner reports to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Dr. Scott Gottlieb is the current acting commissioner.
The FDA has its headquarters in unincorporated White Oak, Maryland. The agency also has 223 field offices and 13 laboratories located throughout the 50 states, the United States Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. In addition, the FDA began posting employees in foreign countries such as China, India, Costa Rica, Chile, Belgium, and the United Kingdom in 2008.
Video: A Brief History & Overview of the FDA
While most of the Centers are located in the Washington, D.C. area as part of the Headquarters divisions, two offices – the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA) and the Office of Criminal Investigations (OCI) – are primarily field offices with a workforce spread across the country.
The Office of Regulatory Affairs is considered the "eyes and ears" of the agency, conducting the vast majority of the FDA's work in the field. Consumer Safety Officers, more commonly called Investigators, are the individuals who inspect production and warehousing facilities, investigate complaints, illnesses, or outbreaks, and review documentation in the case of medical devices, drugs, biological products, and other items where it may be difficult to conduct a physical examination or take a physical sample of the product.
The Office of Regulatory Affairs is divided into five regions, which are further divided into 20 districts. Districts are based roughly on the geographic divisions of the federal court system. Each district comprises a main district office and a number of Resident Posts, which are FDA remote offices that serve a particular geographic area. ORA also includes the Agency's network of regulatory laboratories, which analyze any physical samples taken. Though samples are usually food-related, some laboratories are equipped to analyze drugs, cosmetics, and radiation-emitting devices.
The Office of Criminal Investigations was established in 1991 to investigate criminal cases. Unlike ORA Investigators, OCI Special Agents are armed and don't focus on technical aspects of the regulated industries. OCI agents pursue and develop cases where individuals and companies have committed criminal actions, such as fraudulent claims, or knowingly and willfully shipping known adulterated goods in interstate commerce. In many cases, OCI pursues cases involving Title 18 violations (e.g., conspiracy, false statements, wire fraud, mail fraud), in addition to prohibited acts as defined in Chapter III of the FD&C Act. OCI Special Agents often come from other criminal investigations backgrounds and work closely with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Assistant Attorney General, and even Interpol. OCI receives cases from a variety of sources—including ORA, local agencies, and the FBI—and works with ORA Investigators to help develop the technical and science-based aspects of a case. OCI is a smaller branch, comprising about 200 agents nationwide.
The FDA frequently works with other federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, Drug Enforcement Administration, Customs and Border Protection, and Consumer Product Safety Commission. Often local and state government agencies also work with the FDA to provide regulatory inspections and enforcement action.
The FDA regulates more than U.S. $1 trillion worth of consumer goods, about 25% of consumer expenditures in the United States. This includes $466 billion in food sales, $275 billion in drugs, $60 billion in cosmetics and $18 billion in vitamin supplements. Much of these expenditures are for goods imported into the United States; the FDA is responsible for monitoring imports. 
Scope and Mission
FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.
FDA is also responsible for advancing the public health by helping to speed innovations that make medicines more effective, safer, and more affordable and by helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines and foods to maintain and improve their health. FDA also has responsibility for regulating the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of tobacco products to protect the public health and to reduce tobacco use by minors.
Finally, the FDA plays a significant role in the Nation’s counterterrorism capability. The FDA fulfills this responsibility by ensuring the security of the food supply and by fostering the development of medical products to respond to deliberate and naturally emerging public health threats.
Most federal laws concerning the FDA are part of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, (first passed in 1938 and extensively amended since) and are codified in Title 21, Chapter 9 of the United States Code. Other significant laws enforced by the FDA include the Public Health Service Act, parts of the Controlled Substances Act, the Federal Anti-Tampering Act, as well as many others. In many cases, these responsibilities are shared with other federal agencies.
The programs for safety regulation vary widely by the type of product, its potential risks, and the regulatory powers granted to the agency. For example, the FDA regulates almost every facet of prescription drugs, including testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing, efficacy, and safety—yet FDA regulation of cosmetics focuses primarily on labeling and safety. The FDA regulates most products with a set of published standards enforced by a modest number of facility inspections. Inspection observations are documented on FDA Form 483.
Regulation of Food and Dietary Supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
The regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is governed by various statutes enacted by the United States Congress and interpreted by the FDA. Pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("the Act") and accompanying legislation, the FDA has authority to oversee the quality of substances sold as food in the United States and to monitor claims made in the labeling about both the composition and the health benefits of foods.
The FDA subdivides substances that it regulates as food into various categories—including foods, food additives, added substances (man-made substances that are not intentionally introduced into food but nevertheless end up in it), and dietary supplements. Specific standards the FDA exercises differ from one category to the next. Furthermore, legislation had granted the FDA a variety of means to address violations of standards for a given substance category.
The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research uses different requirements for the three main drug product types: new drugs, generic drugs, and over-the-counter drugs. A drug is considered "new" if it is made by a different manufacturer, uses different excipients or inactive ingredients, is used for a different purpose, or undergoes any substantial change. The most rigorous requirements apply to new molecular entities: drugs that are not based on existing medications.
New drugs receive extensive scrutiny before FDA approval in a process called a New Drug Application (NDA). New drugs are available only by prescription by default. A change to over-the-counter (OTC) status is a separate process, and the drug must be approved through an NDA first. A drug that is approved is said to be "safe and effective when used as directed."
Advertising and Promotion
The FDA's Office of Prescription Drug Promotion reviews and regulates prescription drug advertising and promotion through surveillance activities and issuance of enforcement letters to pharmaceutical manufacturers. Advertising and promotion for over-the-counter drugs are regulated by the Federal Trade Commission.
The drug advertising regulation contains two broad requirements: (1) a company may advertise or promote a drug only for the specific indication or medical use for which it was approved by the FDA. Also, an advertisement must contain a "fair balance" between the benefits and the risks (side effects) of a drug.
The term off-label refers to drug usage for indications other than those approved by the FDA.
Postmarket Safety Surveillance
After NDA approval, the sponsor must review and report to the FDA every patient adverse drug experience it learns of. They must report unexpected serious and fatal adverse drug events within 15 days, and other events on a quarterly basis.  The FDA also receives directly adverse drug event reports through its MedWatch program.  These reports are called "spontaneous reports" because reporting by consumers and health professionals is voluntary.
While this remains the primary tool of postmarket safety surveillance, FDA requirements for postmarketing risk management are increasing. As a condition of approval, a sponsor may be required to conduct additional clinical trials, called Phase IV trials. In some cases, the FDA requires risk management plans for some drugs that may provide for other kinds of studies, restrictions, or safety surveillance activities.
Generic drugs are chemical equivalents of name-brand drugs whose patents have expired. In general, they are less expensive than their name brand counterparts, are manufactured and marketed by other companies and, in the 1990s, accounted for about a third of all prescriptions written in the United States. For the approval of a generic drug, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires scientific evidence that the generic drug is interchangeable with or therapeutically equivalent to the originally approved drug. This is called an "ANDA" (Abbreviated New Drug Application). As of 2012 80% of all FDA approved drugs are available in generic form.
Generic Drug Scandal
In 1989, a major scandal erupted involving the procedures used by the FDA to approve generic drugs for sale to the public. Charges of corruption in generic drug approval first emerged in 1988, in the course of an extensive congressional investigation into the FDA. The oversight subcommittee of the United States House Energy and Commerce Committee resulted from a complaint brought against the FDA by Mylan Laboratories Inc. of Pittsburgh. When its application to manufacture generics were subjected to repeated delays by the FDA, Mylan, convinced that it was being discriminated against, soon began its own private investigation of the agency in 1987.
Mylan eventually filed suit against two former FDA employees and four drug-manufacturing companies, charging that corruption within the federal agency resulted in racketeering and in violations of antitrust law. "The order in which new generic drugs were approved was set by the FDA employees even before drug manufacturers submitted applications" and, according to Mylan, this illegal procedure was followed to give preferential treatment to certain companies. During the summer of 1989, three FDA officials (Charles Y. Chang, David J. Brancato, Walter Kletch) pleaded guilty to criminal charges of accepting bribes from generic drugs makers, and two companies (Par Pharmaceutical and its subsidiary Quad Pharmaceuticals) pleaded guilty to giving bribes.
Furthermore, it was discovered that several manufacturers had falsified data submitted in seeking FDA authorization to market certain generic drugs. Vitarine Pharmaceuticals of New York, which sought approval of a generic version of the drug Dyazide, a medication for high blood pressure, submitted Dyazide, rather than its generic version, for the FDA tests. In April 1989, the FDA investigated 11 manufacturers for irregularities; and later brought that number up to 13. Dozens of drugs were eventually suspended or recalled by manufacturers. In the early 1990s, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed securities fraud charges against the Bolar Pharmaceutical Company, a major generic manufacturer based in Long Island, New York.
Over-the-counter (OTC) drugs like aspirin are drugs and combinations that do not require a doctor's prescription.  The FDA has a list of approximately 800 approved ingredients that are combined in various ways to create more than 100,000 OTC drug products. Many OTC drug ingredients had been previously approved prescription drugs now deemed safe enough for use without a medical practitioner's supervision like ibuprofen
In 2014, the FDA added an Ebola treatment being developed by Canadian pharmaceutical company Tekmira to the Fast Track program but halted the phase 1 trials in July pending the receipt of more information about how the drug works. This is seen as increasingly important in the face of a major outbreak of the disease in West Africa that began in late March 2014 and continued as of August 2014.
Vaccines, blood and tissue products, and biotechnology
The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research is the branch of the FDA responsible for ensuring the safety and efficacy of biological therapeutic agents.  These include blood and blood products, vaccines, allergenics, cell, and tissue-based products, and gene therapy products. New biologics are required to go through a premarket approval process called a Biologics License Application (BLA), similar to that for drugs.
The original authority for government regulation of biological products was established by the 1902 Biologics Control Act, with additional authority established by the 1944 Public Health Service Act. Along with these Acts, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act applies to all biologic products, as well. Originally, the entity responsible for the regulation of biological products resided under the National Institutes of Health; this authority was transferred to the FDA in 1972.
Medical and radiation-emitting devices
The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) is the branch of the FDA responsible for the premarket approval of all medical devices, as well as overseeing the manufacturing, performance, and safety of these devices. The definition of a medical device is given in the FD&C Act, and it includes products from the simple toothbrush to complex devices such as implantable brain pacemakers. CDRH also oversees the safety performance of non-medical devices that emit certain types of electromagnetic radiation. Examples of CDRH-regulated devices include cellular phones, airport baggage screening equipment, television receivers, microwave ovens, tanning booths, and laser products.
CDRH regulatory powers include the authority to require certain technical reports from the manufacturers or importers of regulated products, to require that radiation-emitting products meet mandatory safety performance standards, to declare regulated products defective, and to order the recall of defective or noncompliant products. CDRH also conducts limited amounts of direct product testing.
"FDA-Cleared" vs "FDA-Approved"
Clearance requests are for medical devices that prove they are "substantially equivalent" to the predicate devices already on the market. Approved requests are for items that are new or substantially different and need to demonstrate "safety and efficacy", for example, it may be inspected for safety in case of new toxic hazards. Both aspects need to be proved or provided by the submitter to ensure proper procedures are followed.
"FDA-Approved" vs. "FDA-Accepted in Food Processing"
The FDA does not approve applied coatings used in the food processing industry. There is no review process to approve the composition of nonstick coatings, nor does the FDA inspect or test these materials. Through their governing of processes, however, the FDA does have a set of regulations that cover the formulation, manufacturing, and use of nonstick coatings. Hence, materials like Polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) are not, and cannot be, considered as FDA Approved, rather, they are "FDA Compliant" or "FDA Acceptable."
Cosmetics are regulated by the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, the same branch of the FDA that regulates food. Cosmetic products are not, in general, subject to premarket approval by the FDA unless they make "structure or function claims" that make them into drugs, However, all color additives must be specifically FDA approved before manufacturers can include them in cosmetic products sold in the U.S. The FDA regulates cosmetics labeling, and cosmetics that have not been safety tested must bear a warning to that effect.
Though the cosmetic industry is predominantly responsible in ensuring the safety of its products, the FDA also has the power to intervene when necessary to protect the public but in general does not require pre-market approval or testing. Companies are required to place a warning note on their products if they have not been tested. Experts in cosmetic ingredient reviews also play a role in monitoring safety through influence on the use of ingredients, but also lack legal authority. Overall the organization has reviewed about 1,200 ingredients and has suggested that several hundred be restricted, but there is no standard or systemic method for reviewing chemicals for safety and a clear definition of what is meant by 'safety' so that all chemicals are tested on the same basis.
The Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) is the branch of the FDA that regulates food, food additives, and drugs that are given to animals, including food animals and pets. CVM does not regulate vaccines for animals; these are handled by the United States Department of Agriculture.
CVM's primary focus is on medications that are used in food animals and ensuring that they do not affect the human food supply. The FDA's requirements to prevent the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy are also administered by CVM through inspections of feed manufacturers.
Since the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act became law in 2009, the FDA also has had the authority to regulate tobacco products. 
In 2009, Congress passed a law requiring color warnings on cigarette packages and on printed advertising, in addition to text warnings from the U.S. Surgeon General. However, these new labels were halted because of a court case entitled R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. To date, these new labels have not been put into place.
QUESTION FOR DISCUSSION: SHOULD THE FDA REGULATE E-CIGARETTES AS TOBACCO PRODUCTS?
Recently E-Cigarettes have hit the market as "safe" alternatives to the negative effects of tobacco products. Do you think the evidence shows that E-Cigarettes should be regulated in the same way as other tobacco products or do they serve as an alternative to the health risks of tobacco addiction and tobacco products?
Regulation of living organisms
With the acceptance of premarket notification 510(k) k033391 in January 2004, the FDA granted Dr. Ronald Sherman permission to produce and market medical maggots for use in humans or other animals as a prescription medical device. Medical maggots represent the first living organism allowed by the Food and Drug Administration for production and marketing as a prescription medical device.
In June 2004, the FDA cleared Hirudo medicinalis (medicinal leeches) as the second living organism to be used as medical devices.
The FDA also requires milk to be pasteurized to remove bacteria and maintains oversight of probiotic products containing living bacterial organisms.
The FCC is an independent agency of the United States government, created by Congressional statute (see 47 U.S.C. § 151 and 47 U.S.C. § 154) to regulate interstate communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories. The FCC works towards six goals in the areas of broadband, competition, the spectrum, the media, public safety, and homeland security. The Commission is also in the process of modernizing itself.
The FCC was formed by the Communications Act of 1934 to replace the radio regulation functions of the Federal Radio Commission. The FCC took over wire communication regulation from the Interstate Commerce Commission. The FCC's mandated jurisdiction covers the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. possessions. The FCC also provides varied degrees of cooperation, oversight, and leadership for similar communications bodies in other countries of North America.
The FCC's mission, specified in Section One of the Communications Act of 1934 and amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (amendment to 47 U.S.C. §151) is to "make available so far as possible, to all the people of the United States, without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex, rapid, efficient, nationwide, and worldwide wire and radio communication services with adequate facilities at reasonable charges." The Act furthermore provides that the FCC was created "for the purpose of the national defense" and "for the purpose of promoting safety of life and property through the use of wire and radio communications."
Consistent with the objectives of the Act as well as the 1993 Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), the FCC has identified six goals in its 2006–2011 Strategic Plan. These are:
"All Americans should have affordable access to robust and reliable broadband products and services. Regulatory policies must promote technological neutrality, competition, investment, and innovation to ensure that broadband service providers have sufficient incentives to develop and offer such products and services."
"Competition in the provision of communication services, both domestically and overseas, supports the Nation's economy. The competitive framework for communications services should foster innovation and offer consumers reliable, meaningful choice in affordable services."
"Efficient and effective use of non-federal spectrum domestically and internationally promotes the growth and rapid development of innovative and efficient communication technologies and services."
"The Nation's media regulations must promote competition and diversity and facilitate the transition to digital modes of delivery."
Public Safety and Homeland Security
"Communications during emergencies and crisis must be available for public safety, health, defense, and emergency personnel, as well as all consumers in need. The Nation's critical communications infrastructure must be reliable, interoperable, redundant, and rapidly restorable."
Modernize the FCC
"The Commission shall strive to be highly productive, adaptive, and innovative organization that maximizes the benefits to stakeholders, staff, and management from effective systems, processes, resources, and organizational culture."
The Federal Communications Commission regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories. An independent U.S. government agency overseen by Congress, the commission is the United States' primary authority for communications law, regulation and technological innovation. In its work facing economic opportunities and challenges associated with rapidly evolving advances in global communications, the agency capitalizes on its competencies in:
What does the FCC do?
- The FCC has been charged with a number of tasks related to the communications infrastructure of the United States. These include:
- Promoting competition, innovation, and investment in broadband services and facilities
- Supporting the nation's economy by ensuring an appropriate competitive framework for the unfolding of the communications revolution
- Encouraging the highest and best use of spectrum domestically and internationally
- Revising media regulations so that new technologies flourish alongside diversity and localism
- Providing leadership in strengthening the defense of the nation's communications infrastructure
The agency is directed by five commissioners who are appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The president also selects one of the commissioners to serve as chairman. Only three commissioners can be of the same political party at any given time and none can have a financial interest in any commission-related business. All commissioners, including the chairman, have five-year terms, except when filling an unexpired term.
The commission is organized into bureaus and offices, based on function (see also Organizational Charts of the FCC). Bureau and office staff members regularly share expertise to cooperatively fulfill responsibilities such as:
- Developing and implementing regulatory programs
- Processing applications for licenses and other filings
- Encouraging the development of innovative services
- Conducting investigations and analyzing complaints
- Public safety and homeland security
- Consumer information and education
- Rules and Rulemakings
The FCC's rules and regulations are in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), which are published and maintained by the Government Printing Office. Title 47 Rules & Regulations are also available on the web in a searchable format.
Most FCC rules are adopted by a process known as "notice and comment" rulemaking. Under that process, the FCC gives the public notice that it is considering adopting or modifying rules on a particular subject and seeks the public's comment. The Commission considers the comments received in developing final rules. For more information, check out our online summary of the Rulemaking Process at the FCC.
In 1972 Congress passed the Federal Advisory Committee Act to ensure that advice by advisory committees is objective and accessible to the public. The Act put in place a process for establishing, operating, overseeing, and terminating these committees that provide valuable input from consumer groups, industry stakeholders, public safety officials and other interested parties.
The FCC is organized into seven bureaus and ten staff offices. In general, the bureaus handle license applications and related filings, as well as analyzing complaints, developing and enacting regulations, conducting investigations and participating in hearings. The seven bureaus are:
Consumer & Governmental Affairs (CGB) oversees the FCC’s consumer policies, including disability access. It handles outreach and education through its Consumer Center, which responds to consumer questions and complaints. CGB also collaborates with state, local and tribal governments to ensure emergency preparedness.
Enforcement Bureau is responsible for enforcing the provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as well as FCC rules, orders, terms and conditions of station authorizations. This bureau helps to foster local competition and consumer protection, public safety and homeland security.
International Bureau (IB) helps to develop international telecommunications policy on issues such as allocation of frequencies and minimizing electromagnetic interference. IB is responsible for maintaining FCC compliance with the International Radio Regulations and other international agreements.
Media Bureau develops and implements policy and licensing programs relating to electronic media, such as cable television, broadcast television, and radio. Post-licensing for direct broadcast satellite services also falls within its purview.
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau is responsible for all FCC wireless telecommunications programs, policies and outreach programs. These services include amateur radio, cellular networks, pagers, Personal Communications Service (PCS), Part 27 Wireless Communications Services and fixed, mobile and broadcast services in the 700 MHz band.
Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB) assists in policy development for wireline telecommunications (broadband) to promote growth and investments in infrastructure, development, markets, and services.
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau develops and implements communications for use during emergencies and crises. In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, this bureau was added to make sure public safety, health, defense and emergency personnel, and consumers can communicate during times of greatest need.
Broadcast Radio and TV
Specific FCC functions include assigning frequency, power, and call signs for radio; allocating spectrum space for AM and FM radio, as well as VHF and UHF television broadcast services; designating sign-on/sign-off times and operating power for broadcast stations. Although the FCC is prohibited from censoring most programming content, it does, however, regulate material deemed indecent or illegal (which includes, for example, cigarette advertising), some aspects of programming for children, and political campaign advertising.
The FCC limits the number of broadcasting outlets that may be owned by a single entity and reviews these regulations biennially. The effect of telecommunications reform has been toward loosening such restrictions. In 1996 the FCC removed the upper limit for the number of TV stations that could be owned nationally, provided that the combined viewership does not exceed 35 percent of all U.S. households. Within local markets, restrictions are much tighter to prevent a media monopoly. In general, the same company may not own a TV station along with a newspaper, a second TV station, a cable system, or a radio station. Radio station ownership rules tend to be more liberal, allowing up to eight stations in a single market depending on the total number of stations serving that market. As with television, there is no limit on the number of stations a company can hold nationally.
Through its Cable Services Bureau, the commission licenses cable television systems and regulates cable pricing, technical standards, and programming. Pricing is only regulated when local cable competition does not exist according to FCC definitions. The FCC requires that certain local broadcast programming be made available through cable systems and that at least one noncommercial channel be carried on every cable system. The agency also mandates that cable systems have a formal equal employment opportunity program, monitors compliance, and investigates claims of discrimination.
All forms of telephony, including local, long-distance, and wireless, fall under the FCC's purview. This area, in particular, has been subject to considerable reform under the deregulation of the 1990s. The FCC is gradually allowing local service providers, such as the regional Bell operating companies (BOCs), to offer long-distance services once they demonstrate that their respective markets are open to local competition; long-distance companies can also enter local markets. Deregulation has likewise allowed a number of BOCs to merge with other BOCs. The FCC also regulates pricing of telephone network services to prevent local monopolies from charging exorbitant fees to access their networks. Wireless communications like cellular phones and personal communications systems (PCS) are much less regulated, and providers of local and long-distance wire service are permitted to also offer wireless packages.
New and Emerging Technologies
The FCC also holds a major stake in the development of emerging communications technologies. Two of the most important currently are the Internet and digital television. The largely unregulated Internet presents a complex regulatory environment because of its diffused technical and competitive structure. The FCC's policy has been decidedly hands-off, but the agency has statutory powers to control many aspects of Internet service, including pricing, competition, and some content. FCC officials have been very cautious, however, not to encourage a monopoly system as was done formerly with telephone service; the commission's leadership continues to favor a largely unrestricted Internet. Significantly, this laissez-faire approach to the Internet was not a new stance for the FCC—one of its commissioners claimed the agency had a 20-year history of shaping the free Internet by choosing not to regulate it as it became commercially viable.
The FCC played a stronger role in the development of digital television (DTV), but it again deferred many decisions to service providers. It created a timetable for the roll-out of DTV and the eventual elimination of analog television broadcasting. With early digital broadcasts starting in 1998, the FCC created a transition period extending through at least 2006 for broadcasters and consumers to convert to digital equipment. The FCC planned to review the end date periodically to ensure minimal disruption of service. The technical standards for DTV were left up to industry groups and companies to negotiate.
Indecency: The FCC has the authority to regulate what is said and shown on broadcast television through a series of decency standards that have been in place since the advent of television in the 1950s. Perhaps the most controversial case is that of the “wardrobe malfunction” of the 2004 Super Bowl where Janet Jackson’s top was “accidentally” ripped off by Justin Timberlake. MTV and its parent company CBS were prosecuted and fined by the FCC for violating its decency standards. In another case surrounding radio talk show host Howard Stern in which stations were fined more than $2.5 million between 1990 and 2004 for violating radio decency standards, which refer to obscene language. Eventually Stern left broadcast radio and moved his show to satellite network Sirius where the decency standards and FCC regulation did not apply.
It is a violation of federal law to air obscene programming at any time or indecent programming or profane language from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Congress has given the FCC the responsibility for administratively enforcing these laws. The FCC may revoke a station license, impose a monetary forfeiture or issue a warning if a station airs obscene, indecent or profane material.
Obscene broadcasts are prohibited at all times
- Obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution and cannot be broadcast at any time. The Supreme Court has established that to be considered obscene material must meet a three-pronged test:
- An average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.
- The material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law.
- The material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
Indecent broadcast restrictions
The FCC has defined broadcast indecency as "language or material that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory organs or activities." Indecent programming contains patently offensive sexual or excretory material that does not rise to the level of obscenity. The courts hold that indecent material is protected by the First Amendment and cannot be banned entirely. FCC rules prohibit indecent speech on broadcast radio and television between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.
Profane broadcast restrictions
The FCC defines profanity as "including language so grossly offensive to members of the public who actually hear it as to amount to a nuisance." Like indecency, profane speech is prohibited on broadcast radio and television between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.
Cable and satellite services excepted from indecency restrictions
Congress has charged the Commission with enforcing the statutory prohibition against airing indecent programming "by means of radio communications." The Commission has historically interpreted this restriction to apply to radio and television broadcasters and has never extended it to cover cable or satellite operators. In addition, because cable and satellite services are subscription-based, viewers of these services have greater control over the programming content that comes into their homes, whereas broadcast content traditionally has been available to any member of the public with a radio or television. As noted above, however, obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution and is prohibited with respect to cable and satellite services, as well as radio and television broadcasters.
Video: CSPAN Discussion on FCC Decency Standards
Net Neutrality: An Open Internet means consumers can go where they want when they want. This principle is often referred to as Net Neutrality. It means innovators can develop products and services without asking for permission. It means consumers will demand more and better broadband as they enjoy new lawful Internet services, applications, and content, and broadband providers cannot block, throttle, or create special "fast lanes" for that content. The FCC's Open Internet rules protect and maintain open, uninhibited access to legal online content without broadband Internet access providers being allowed to block, impair, or establish fast/slow lanes to lawful content.
Net Neutrality Rules: Adopted on February 26, 2015, the FCC's Open Internet rules are designed to protect free expression and innovation on the Internet and promote investment in the nation's broadband networks. The Open Internet rules are grounded in the strongest possible legal foundation by relying on multiple sources of authority, including Title II of the Communications Act and Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. As part of this decision, the Commission also refrains (or "forbears") from enforcing provisions of Title II that are not relevant to modern broadband service. Together Title II and Section 706 support clear rules of the road, providing the certainty needed for innovators and investors, and the competitive choices and freedom demanded by consumers.
The new rules apply to both fixed and mobile broadband service. This approach recognizes advances in technology and the growing significance of mobile broadband Internet access in recent years. These rules will protect consumers no matter how they access the Internet, whether on a desktop computer or a mobile device. These “Bright Line” rules include:
- No Blocking: broadband providers may not block access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.
- No Throttling: broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.
- No Paid Prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind—in other words, no "fast lanes." This rule also bans ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.
To ensure an open Internet now and in the future, the Open Internet rules also establish a legal standard for other broadband provider practices to ensure that they do not unreasonably interfere with or disadvantage consumers' access to the Internet. The rules build upon existing, strong transparency requirements. They ensure that broadband providers maintain the ability to manage the technical and engineering aspects of their networks. The legal framework used to support these rules also positions the Commission for the first time to be able to address issues that may arise in the exchange of traffic between mass-market broadband providers and other networks and services.
Video: Net Neutrality Rules Explained
ISSUE FOR DEBATE: NET NEUTRALITY
1. How do you use the Internet on a daily basis? Keep a one-day log to see what types of activities you use Internet-connected devices for and how much time you spend on each. What percent of your time is spent on the Internet? What percent of that Internet time is spent on each type of activity?
2. Many Internet activities that we depend upon on a daily basis demand a more robust Internet infrastructure than other activities (ex: Video takes a lot more bandwidth and infrastructure than sending a text or email). These varied demands on the Internet's infrastructure have triggered a debate about 'Net Neutrality,' an issue rooted in how content should be delivered to consumers. In a nutshell, companies that provide 'high speed' or broadband networks (i.e., phone company DSL or cable Internet services) want to be able to charge higher fees to those who send data-heavy content on the Internet in return for getting that content to consumers faster than the content of individuals or companies who don't pay the higher fees. Broadband network providers say it's only fair that those who place a greater demand on the network should pay more. Critics of this approach believe that such a tiered system would limit the 'openness,' 'freedom' and 'neutrality' of the Internet because not all content providers would be able to reach consumers on a level playing field; those with money would be given an unfair advantage. Some also worry that network providers might block or censor some people's content based on economic or political resources and power. This debate is now being addressed by the FDA with the agency leaning toward the side of ‘net neutrality.’
3. Watch the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxgCWzU_uVM then use internet resources listed below to research the question below.
4. Prepare arguments (with appropriate evidence) to answer the following question:
Should the Internet be protected using a “net neutral” policy or should those companies like Netflix be able to get a “fast lane” to deliver their content (based on their ability to pay for it)? What positive and negative characteristics can you identify for both sides of the argument?
- How does the mission of an independent executive agency differ from that of an independent regulatory agency? Give an example of each.
- What controversies have the agencies discussed in this section encountered? What issues or problems tend to lead to such controversies?
- How does Congress maintain control over independent agencies?
- How do these agencies impact your daily life? Give an example from each of the agencies discussed in this section.
- What would our lives be like if independent agencies did not exist within our government?
- Do you believe these agencies have grown too powerful? Explain.
Lale Tayla & Figen Bingul (2007). "NASA stands "for the benefit of all."—Interview with NASA's Dr. Süleyman Gokoglu". The Light Millennium.
U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission, NACA. centennialofflight.net. Retrieved on November 3, 2011.
"NASA workforce profile". NASA. January 11, 2011. Retrieved December 17, 2012.
Teitel, Amy (December 2, 2011). "A Mixed Bag for NASA's 2012 Budget". DiscoveryNews. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
"Ike in History: Eisenhower Creates NASA". Eisenhower Memorial. 2013. Retrieved November 27, 2013.
"The National Aeronautics and Space Act". NASA. 2005. Retrieved August 29, 2007.
Bilstein, Roger E. (1996). "From NACA to NASA". NASA SP-4206, Stages to Saturn: A Technol ogical History of the Apollo/Saturn Launch Vehicles. NASA. pp. 32–33. ISBN 978-0-16-00425 9-1. Retrieved May 6, 2013. ^ Shouse, Mary (July 9, 2009). "Welcome to NASA Headquarters". Retrieved July 15, 2009.
Information for Non U.S. Citizens, NASA (downloaded September 16, 2013)
"T. Keith Glennan biography". NASA. August 4, 2006. Retrieved July 5, 2008.
Cabbage, Michael (July 15, 2009). "Bolden and Garver Confirmed by U.S. Senate" (Press release). NASA. Retrieved July 16, 2009.
"MSFC_Fact_sheet" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved October 1, 2011.
Rogers, Simon. (February 1, 2010) Nasa budgets: US spending on space travel since 1958 |Soc iety. theguardian.com. Retrieved on 2013-08-26.
Launius, Roger D. "Public opinion polls and perceptions of US human spaceflight". Division of Space History, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution.
"Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Estimates" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved February 13, 2013.
"Past, Present, and Future of NASA — U.S. Senate Testimony". Hayden Planetarium. March 7, 2012. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
"Past, Present, and Future of NASA — U.S. Senate Testimony (Video)". Hayden Planetarium. March 7, 2012. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
"US Environmental Protection Agency". Retrieved 21 October2013. http://www.epa.gov/
"Our Mission and What We Do". US EPA. Retrieved 8 December2010. http://www.epa.gov/aboutep a/whatwedo.html
"Public Access – When and how was the EPA Created?". U.S. EPA. Retrieved 6 November 2011. http://publicaccess.supportportal.com/link/portal/23002/23012/Article/23723/When-and-how- was-the-EPA-created
Obama, Barack (4 March 2013). "Remarks by the President in Personnel Announcements". White House Press Release. Retrieved23 July 2013. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013 /03/04/remarks-president-personnel-announcements
Joseph Kahn and Jim Yardley (August 26, 2007). "As China Roars, Pollution Reaches Deadly Extremes". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/world/asia/26china.html
Also see U.S. Census Bureau spreadsheet http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/07s04 83.xls
"History of the Clean Air Act". Clean Air Act website. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012-01-17. Retrieved 2013-02-26. epa.gov/air/caa/caa_history.html
Luther, Linda. "The National Environmental Policy Act: Background and Implementation" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 21 October 2013. http://www.fta.dot.gov/ documents/Unit1_01CRSReport.pdf
"The Guardian: Origins of the EPA". EPA History webpage. United States Environmental Protection Agency website. 1992. Retrieved2012-03-03. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/history /publications/print/origins.html
Environmental Protection Agency. "When and how was EPA Created?". Retrieved 6 February 20 13. http://publicaccess.supportportal.com/link/portal/23002/23012/Article/23723/When-and- how-was-the-EPA-created
Jackson, H.M. "Scoop" (1969-07-09). "Senate Report No. 91-296 - NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969". Calendar 287. U.S. Congress. p. 11. Retrieved 2013-03-10. http://www. fta.dot.gov/documents/Unit1_04SenateReport91-2961.doc
Weiland, Paul S. (Spring 1997). "Amending the National Environmental Policy Act: Federal Environmental Protection in the Twenty-First Century" (PDF). Journal of Land Use & Enviro nmental Law: 275–301. Retrieved 21 February 2015. http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/landuse /Vol122/Weiland.pdf
"Legislative Accomplishments :: Henry M. Jackson Foundation". Hmjackson.org. Retrieved 2013 -12-02. http://www.hmjackson.org/index.php?p=Legislative_Accomplishments&s=236
Wald, Matthew L. "E.P.A. Building Re-named for Clinton". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 July 2013. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/17/e-p-a-building-re-named-for-clin ton/
"About the Office of the Administrator | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010-11-17. Retriev
"About the Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010-11-17.
ed 2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/ao.html
"About the Office of Administration and Resources Management (OARM) | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010-11-17. Retrieved2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/oarm.html Retrieved 2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/oar.html
"About the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) ;". Epa.gov. 2014-05- 13. Retrieved 2014-05-19. http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-office-chemical-safety-and- pollution-prevention-ocspp
"About the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010-11-17. Retrieved 2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/oeca.html
"About the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010- 11-17. Retrieved 2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/oei.html
"About the Office of General Counsel (OGC) | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010-11-17. Retrieved 2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/ogc.html
"About the Office of International and Tribal Affairs (OITA) | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010-11-17. Retrieved 2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/oia.html
"About the Office of Research and Development (ORD) | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010- 11-17. Retrieved 2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/ord.html
"About the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) | About EPA | US EPA". Epa. gov. 2010-11-17. Retrieved2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/oswer.html
"About the Office of Water | About EPA | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2010-11-17. Retrieved 2012- 10-21. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/ow.html
"EPA SDSI Home Page". Epa.gov. 2008-12-22. Retrieved2011-07-16. http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs /projects/formulat/sdsi.htm
"CleanGredients Home Page". Cleangredients.org. Retrieved2011-07-16. http://www.cleangre dients.org/
"Federal Test Procedure Revisions". 1996-10-22. Retrieved2009-10-03. http://www.epa.gov/ OMS/sftp.htm
"EPA Fuel Economy". Epa.gov. Retrieved 2011-07-16. ttp://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/420f06069 .htm
"Welcome to Your MPG!". Fueleconomy.gov. Retrieved2012-10-21. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/ mpg/MPG.doc
"The Truth About EPA City / Highway MPG Estimates". August 2009. Retrieved 2010-08-19. http://www.caranddriver.com/features/09q3/the_truth_about_epa_city_highway_mpg_estimates -feature
(2010-11-17). "Honda Finds EVs a Perfect Fit | Autopia". Wired.com. Retrieved 2011-07-16. http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/11/honda-finds-evs-a-perfect-fit
Turner, D.B. (1994). Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling (2nd ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 1-56670-023-X. www.crcpress.com http://www. crcpress.com/shopping_cart/products/product_detail.asp?sku=L1023&parent_id=&pc=
Beychok, M.R. (2005). Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion (4th ed.). author-published. ISBN 0-9644588-0-2. Air-dispersion.com http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentals_Of_Stack _Gas_Dispersion
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC."WaterSense Timeline." Revised 2011-04-14. http://www.epa.gov/watersense/about_us/timeline.html
EPA. "WaterSense." www.epa.gov/watersense/news/archive/2006.htm
Sandy Bauers (2012-12-07). "Spike in iodine-131 found in city water". Philadelphia Inquirer. p. 2. Retrieved 2012-12-07. http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20121207_Spike _in_iodine-131_found_in_city_water.html
"Iodine-131 levels in Philadelphia, PA drinking water". EPA RadNet Environfacts. EPA. Retrieved 7 December 2012. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/erams_query_v2.simple_output?Lloca tion=City&pStation=0&subloc=PHILADELPHIA%2CPA&media=DRINKING+WATER&radi=Iodine-131&Fromyear =1978&Toyear=2012&units=Traditional
Jeff McMahon (2013-04-10). "EPA Draft Stirs Fears of Radically Relaxed Radiation Guidelines" .Forbes. Retrieved 2013-05-14. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2013/04/10/epa-draft- stirs-fears-of-radically-relaxed-radiation-guidelines/
Radiation Protection Programs retrieved 2011-7-9 http://www.epa.gov/radiation/programs.html
"Radioactive Waste Management" (WEBSITE). EPA. 28 February 2013. Retrieved 2014-06-02. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/waste-management-overview.html
"EPA Protective Action Guides, Draft for interim use" (PDF). EPA. 2 April 2013. p. 86. Retrieved 2014-06-02. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/er/pag-manual-interim-public-comment -4-2-2013.pdf
"EPA Cleanup and Multi-Agency Programs" (WEBSITE). EPA. 14 February 2013. Retrieved 2014- 06-02. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/emcp-overview.html
"Risk Assessment and Federal Guidance Programs" (WEBSITE). EPA. 9 February 2012. Retrieved 2014-06-02. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/rafg-overview.html
"Naturally-Occurring Radiation Program" (WEBSITE). EPA. 28 February 2013. Retrieved 2014- 06-02. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/natural-radiation-overview.html
"Radionuclides in Air and Water" (WEBSITE). EPA. 28 February 2013. Retrieved 2014-06-02. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/air-water-overview.html
"Radiation Source Reduction and Management" (WEBSITE). EPA. 7 February 2013. Retrieved 2014-06-02. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/source-reduction-management/index.htm l
"About the OSV Bold". EPA. pp. EPA 842–F–05–004. Retrieved2009-01-17. http://www.epa.gov/ow ow/osvbold/brochure.html
Long, Katherine. "What a $5,000 deal: Seattle Central gets former Navy ship | Local News". The Seattle Times. Retrieved 2013-12-02. http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021743030 _sccvesselxml.html
"EPA – Wetlands – Wetlands Fact Sheet". Epa.gov. 2006-06-28. Retrieved 2011-07-16.
Regulations Create Jobs, Too; Vilified on the campaign trail, government rules often create as many jobs as they kill, February 09, 2012 http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/wetlands/facts/fact28. html
GOP freshmen return, resume effort to roll back regulations9/6/2011 http://www.usatoday.com /news/washington/story/2011-09-05/GOP-freshmen-return-resume-effort-to-roll-back-regulations /50267540/1
A Debate Arises on Job Creation and Environment September 4, 2011 http://www.nytimes.com/ 2011/09/05/business/economy/a-debate-arises-on-job-creation-vs-environmental-regulation.html
Is the EPA really a 'jobs killer'? November 22, 2011 http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics /2011/1122/Is-the-EPA-really-a-jobs-killer
"LT2 Rule | Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | US EPA". Water.epa.gov. Retrieved 2014-10-30. http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/lt2/regulations.cfm
"Lost in Yonkers?Head South from Hillview" (PDF). Weekly Pipeline (NYC Department of Environmental Protection) II (80). 2011-07-11. Retrieved 2014-10-30. http://www.nyc.gov/html /dep/pdf/pipeline/0280_pipeline.pdf
"Federal government may scrap much-derided $1.6 billion reservoir cap". NY Daily News. 2011 -08-21. Retrieved 2014-10-30. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/federal-government- scrap-much-derided-1-6-billion-reservoir-cap-article-1.949327
OIN Local 6 (2013-06-03). "City to drop reservoir fight". Portland Tribune. Retrieved 2014- 10-30. http://portlandtribune.com/pt/9-news/153796-city-to-drop-reservoir-fight
"Uncovered Reservoirs". City of Portland Water Bureau. Retrieved 2014-10-30. https://www. portlandoregon.gov/water/article/330807
Views from the Former Administrators, EPA Journal, November 1985. http://www.epa.gov/history /topics/epa/15e.htm#Gorsuch
Sullivan, Patricia. Anne Gorsuch Burford, 62, Dies; Reagan EPA Director, Washington Post, July 22, 2004; Page B06.
DOUGLAS MARTIN Published: July 22, 2004 (2004-07-22). "Anne Gorsuch Burford, 62, Reagan E.P.A. Chief, Dies - New York Times". Nytimes.com. Retrieved 2013-12-02. http://www.nytimes .com/2004/07/22/us/anne-gorsuch-burford-62-reagan-epa-chief-dies.html
"Burford Resigns As Administrator of Embattled EPA", Toledo Blade, Mar 10, 1983, p. 1 http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=73gUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=swIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6140,3000792&dq=anne +mcgill+gorsuch+held+in+contempt+of+congress
Ingersoll, Bruce. Burford out; agency is in 'a shambles', Spokane Chronicle, March 10, 1983 http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=X6YSAAAAIBAJ&sjid=e_kDAAAAIBAJ&pg=528,3563248&dq=anne +mcgill+gorsuch+held+in+contempt+of+congress
Danny Hakim (July 28, 2005). "E.P.A. Holds Back Report on Car Fuel Efficiency". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/28/business/28fuel.html
"EPA Denies California Waiver". ABC. February 29, 2008. http://abclocal.go.com/kfsn/story? section=news/state&id=5980352
Simon, Richard; Wilson, Janet (2007-12-20). "EPA denies California's right to mandate emissions". LATimes.com. Retrieved 2009-11-21. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-epa 20dec20,0,1603760.story?coll=la-home-center
"Absurdity at the EPA: Denying California emissions plan a new low | News for Dallas, Texas | Dallas Morning News | Opinion: Editorials".The Dallas Morning News. 2008-01-01. Retrieved 2009-11-21. http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dallas_Morning_News http://www. dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-EPA_30edi.ART.State.Edit ion1.36bb1ef.html
"Text of Letter from Gov. Schwarzenegger and 13 other Governors Regarding U.S. EPA's Denial of California's Tailpipe Emissions Waiver Request". Gov.ca.gov. Retrieved 2009-11 -21. gov.ca.gov/press-release/8596/
Wilson, Janet (2007-12-21). "EPA chief is said to have ignored staff". LATimes.com. Retrieved 2009-11-21. http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-epa21dec21 ,0,7077099,full.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california
"2010 Chevrolet Equinox LT2 Full Test and Video". EdmundsInsideLine. 2009-09-29. Retrieved 2010-02-17. http://www.insideline.com/chevrolet/equinox/2010/2010-chevrolet-equinox-lt2- full-test-and-video.html
Jared Gall (August 2009). "2010 Chevrolet Equinox LT - Short Take Road Test". Car and Driver. Retrieved 2010-02-17. http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/09q3/2010_chevrolet _equinox_lt-short_take_road_test
John Voelcker (2009-10-27). "Drive Report: 26mpg in 2010 Chevrolet Equinox Four-Cylinder". GreenCarReports.com. Retrieved2010-02-17. http://www.greencarreports.com/blog/1037186_dri ve-report-26-mpg-in-2010-chevrolet-equinox-four-cylinder
"Why the Chevy Equinox EPA Mileage Numbers Don't Add Up". Thetruthaboutcars.com. Retrieved 2011-07-16. http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/why-the-chevy-equinox-epa-mileage-numbers-dont -add-up/
"2010 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2011 Kia Sorento, Program #2939". Motorweek. 2010-05-28. Retrieved 2010-07-06. http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2939a.shtml
"REVIEW: 2010 CHEVROLET EQUINOX LT FWD". http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-equinox- review.html
Commodities Talk- by Hanim Adnan (2012-03-27). "Archives | The Star Online". Thestar.com.my. Retrieved 2013-12-02. http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx?file=%2f2012%2f3%2f27%2fbusiness %2f10991472
"Orang-utan pushed to the brink by palm oil plantations in Borneo". Iucn Nl. Retrieved 2013-12-02. http://www.iucn.nl/en/results/results_per_theme/?11490/Orang-utan-pushed-to- the-brink-by-palm-oil-plantations-in-Borneo
John Shiffman and John Sullivan (December 7, 2008). "An Eroding Mission at EPA; The Bush administration has weakened the agency charged with safeguarding health and the environment" .Philadelphia Inquirer. http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/20081207_An_Eroding_Missio n_at_EPA.html?viewAll=y
"Notification of Closure of the EPA Headquarters Library" (pdf), September 20, 2006 http ://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/06-7803.htm
Letter to Appropriations Committee, Interior and Related Agencies Subcommittee, June 29, 2006 (pdf), from leaders of 16 local EPA unions http://www.peer.org/docs/epa/06_29_6_union_ library_ltr.pdf
EPA Newsbrief, October 1, 2008. Retrieved January 17, 2009. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa /admpress.nsf/4a3d7e51caf96c7a85257359003f533e/9665e31d9c19a212852574d500537a10!OpenDocument
"EPA Library Network Strategic Plan FY 2012- FY 2014 | EPA National Library Network | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2006-06-28. Retrieved2012-10-21. http://www.epa.gov/libraries/strategic _plan.html
Proposed Mercury Rules Bear Industry Mark, Washington Post, January 31, 2004 http://www. washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A64630-2004Jan30
EPA Inspector Finds Mercury Proposal Tainted, Washington Post, February 4, 2005 http:// www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61762-2005Feb3.html
New EPA Mercury Rule Omits Conflicting Data, Washington Post, March 22, 2005 http://www. washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55268-2005Mar21.html
States Sue EPA Over Mercury Emissions, LA Times, March 30, 2005 http://www.waterconserve. info/articles/reader.asp?linkid=40416
Governor Blagojevich and Illinois EPA Propose Aggressive Mercury Controls For Illinois Power Plants, Environmental Progress, Spring 2006, page 12 http://www.epa.state.il.us/env ironmental-progress/v32/n1/environmental-progress.pdf
"Reasons Why Particulate Matter (PM) Should be Included in EPA Settlements with Electric Utility Companies" (PDF). Retrieved2011-07-16. http://www.icac.com/files/public/PMreasons. pdf
"PM Standards Revision - 2006 | Particulate Matter | Air & Radiation | US EPA". Epa.gov. Retrieved 2011-07-16. www.epa.gov/oar/particlepollution/naaqsrev2006.html
"Meddling at EPA? Activists point to survey; Two thirds of 1,586 EPA scientists polled cite interference, UCS reports". Associated Press. April 23, 2008. http://www.msnbc.msn. com/id/24276709/
Stedeford, Todd (2007). "Prior Restraint and Censorship: Acknowledged Occupational Hazards for Government Scientists".William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 31 (3): 725–745. ISSN 0028-0836. http://www.worldcat.org/issn/0028-0836
Josh Harkinson and Kate Sheppard (April 27, 2010). "Coastal Collapse". Slate. Retrieved 1 June 1010. http://www.slate.com/id/2252063
Urbina, Ian (3 March 2011). "Pressure Limits Efforts to Police Drilling for Gas". The New York Times. Retrieved 23 February 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/04/us/04gas.html
DiCosmo, Bridget (15 May 2012). "SAB Pushes To Advise EPA To Conduct Toxicity Tests In Fracking Study". InsideEPA. Inside Washington Publishers. (subscription required). Retrieved 2012-05-19.But some members of the chartered SAB are suggesting that the fracking panel revise its recommendation that the agency scale back its planned toxicity testing of chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, process, because of the limited resources and time frame ... Chesapeake Energy supported the draft recommendation, saying that "an in-depth study of toxicity, the development of new analytical methods and tracers are not practical given the budget and schedule limitation of the study."
Satterfield, John (30 June 2011). "Letter from Chesapeake Energy to EPA" (PDF). InsideEPA (Inside Washington Publishers). (subscription required). Retrieved 2012-05-19. Flowback and Produced water ... Chesapeake agrees that an indepth study of toxicity, the development of new analytic methods and tracers are not practical given the budget and schedule limitations of the study ... Wastewater Treatment and Waste Disposal ... Chesapeake believes there was unjustified emphasis on the surface disposal of produced water to treatment plants in the SAB's Review ... Chesapeake disagrees with the inclusion of water distribution network corrosion and burden of analyzing for contaminants by POTW's into the study.
"The Debate Over the Hydrofracking Study's Scope". The New York Times. 3 March 2011. Retrieved 1 May 2012. While environmentalists have aggressively lobbied the agency to broaden the scope of the study, industry has lobbied the agency to narrow this focus http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/04/us/20110304_natural-gas-documents-intro.html
"Natural Gas Documents". The New York Times. 27 February 2011. Retrieved 5 May 2012. The Times reviewed more than 30,000 pages of documents obtained through open records requests of state and federal agencies and by visiting various regional offices that oversee drilling in Pennsylvania. Some of the documents were leaked by state or federal officials.
O'Neil, S. G. (2007). Superfund: Evaluating the Impact of Executive Order 12898. Environmental Health Perspectives, Volume 115, Number 7, pgs 1087–1093 http://www.ehponl ine.org/members/2007/9903/9903.pdf
Bullard, Robert (2007-07-25). Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Regarding Environmental Justice.
Bullard, Robert. Growing Smarter: Achieving Livable Communities, Environmental Justice, and Regional Equity. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007 en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Press
Rosenbaum, W. A. "Still reforming after all these years: George W. Bush's new era' at the EPA. Environmental Policy: New directions for the Twenty-first century. Washington DC: CQ Press, 2003
Burns, Ronald G. Michael J. Lynch, and Paul Stretesky. Environmental Law, Crime, and Justice. New York: LFB Scholarly publishing Inc, 2008
Environmental Justice Coalition (EJC). "Environmental Justice act of 2009." Environmental Justice Coalition, 2008. EJ Coalition Online: Ejcoalition.Multiply.com http://ejcoalition. multiply.com/journal/item/51/Environmental_Justice_Act_of_2009
"FY 2015 Department of Labor Budget in Brief" (PDF). http://www.dol.gov/dol/budget/2015/PDF /FY2015BIB.pdf
"About OSHA" https://www.osha.gov/about.html
"OSHA History" (PDF). Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/history/OSHA_HISTORY_ 3360s.pdf
"What is an OSHA State Program". https://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/faq.html#oshaprogram
"Section 19 of the OSH Act of 1970: Federal Agency Safety Programs and Responsibilities". Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=OSHAC T&p_id=3373
"Who OSHA Covers". https://www.osha.gov/workers.html#3
"Employer Responsibilities". https://www.osha.gov/as/opa/worker/employer-responsibility.html
"OSHA Training Standards Policy Statement". https://www.osha.gov/dep/standards-policy- statement-memo-04-28-10.html
"Personal Protective Equipment Booklet". www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3151.html
"Personal Protective Equipment fact sheet" (PDF). https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/data_General _Facts/ppe-factsheet.pdf
"OSHA Inspections" (PDF). https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/data_General_Facts/factsheet-inspec tions.pdf
"OSHA Injury and Illness Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements". https://www.osha.gov/ recordkeeping/index.html
"Job Safety and Health: It's the Law Poster" (PDF). https://www.osha.gov/Publications/ osha3165.pdf
"The Whistleblower Protection Program". http://www.whistleblowers.gov/
"Worker's Rights". https://www.osha.gov/workers.html#2
"How to File a Confidential Complaint with OSHA". https://www.osha.gov/as/opa/worker/ complain.html
"Temporary Workers". https://www.osha.gov/temp_workers/index.html
"OSHA Law and Regulations". https://www.osha.gov/law-regs.html
"Commonly Used Statistics". https://www.osha.gov/oshstats/commonstats.html
"Death on the Job: the Toll of Neglect. 20th Edition, 2011" (PDF). AFL-CIO. http://www. aflcio.org/content/download/6485/69821/version/1/file/dotj_2011.pdf
"Employer's Rights and Responsibilities Following and OSHA Inspection". Department of Labor. www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.html
"OSHA Injury and Illnesses and Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements". https://www. osha.gov/recordkeeping/index.html
"On-site Consultation Program". https://www.osha.gov/dcsp/smallbusiness/consult.html
"Safety and Health Achievement Recognition Program". https://www.osha.gov/dcsp/smallbusi ness/sharp.html
"OSHA Administrative Penalty Information Bulletin". https://www.osha.gov/dep/administrative -penalty.html
Justice Dept Drops Most Criminal OSHA Referrals http://occupationalhazards.com/Issue/Article /36865/Justice_Dept_Drops_Most_Criminal_OSHA_Referrals.aspx
Pelley, Scott (2008-06-08). "Is Enough Done To Stop Explosive Dust?". 60 Minutes (CBSnews.com). Retrieved 2008-06-09. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/05/60minutes/ main4157170.shtml
Department of Labor Budget in Brief, FY2013. http://www.dol.gov/dol/budget/2013/PDF/FY201 3BIB.pdf
File an OSHA complaint online https://www.osha.gov/whistleblower/WBComplaint.html
Official website https://www.osha.gov/
OSHA in the Federal Register en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Register
OSHA - Office of Education and Training www.osha.gov/dcsp/ote/index.html
OSHA - Current 29 CFR Books in Digital Format https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owasrch. search_form?p_doc_type=STANDARDS&p_toc_level=0
OSHA - List of Highly Hazardous Chemicals https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_ document?p_id=9761&p_table=standards
Occupational Safety and Health Act text www.legalarchiver.org/osh.htm
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/
The short film "The Story of OSHA (1980)" is available for free download at the Internet Archive archive.org/details/gov.osha.
FDA Centennial 1906–2006". US FDA. Retrieved September 13, 2008. http://www.fda.gov/About FDA/WhatWeDo/History/CentennialofFDA/default.htm
"THE STATE OF THE FDA WORKFORCE" (PDF). http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/Washi ngtonPost/2012/11/19/National-Politics/Graphics/PEW_FDA_Public_19112012.pdf
"FDA Overview" (PDF). USFDA. Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Train ing/ClinicalInvestigatorTrainingCourse/UCM283299.pdf
"Meet Stephen Ostroff, M.D., Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs". US FDA. Retrieved April 9, 2015. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/ucm386097.htm
"Animal Food & Feeds". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/Prod ucts/AnimalFoodFeeds/default.htm
"FDA head Margaret Hamburg to resign in March; Ostroff to be acting chief". February 5, 2015. Retrieved April 8, 2015. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacil ities/WhiteOakCampusInformation/default.htm
"White Oak Campus Information". About FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. February 9, 2011. Retrieved August 11, 2011. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFaci lities/WhiteOakCampusInformation/default.htm
"FDA's International Posts: Improving the Safety of Imported Food and Medical Products". USFDA. Retrieved April 10, 2010. http://test.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm1857 69.htm
Meyer, Eugene L. (24 Feb 2009). "F.D.A. Consolidates at Former Navy Site". NYtimes.com. Retrieved 11 May 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/business/25labs.html?pagewanted=all
Gardiner Harris (November 2, 2008). "The Safety Gap". New York Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/02/magazine/02fda-t.html
Wright, Rob (October 2013). "Drug Take-Back Programs -- Coming To A Municipality Near You". Editor's Note. Life Science Leader 5 (10) (Pennsylvania, USA: VertMarkets at Knowledge Park). p. 6.
ElBoghdady, Dina (February 13, 2012). "FDA budget stays about the same at $2.5 billion". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/44/post /fda-budget-stays-about-the-same-at-25-billion/2012/02/13/gIQAOtABBR_blog.html
"FY 2008 Budget Summary". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Reports ManualsForms/Reports/BudgetReports/2008FDABudgetSummary/ucm082723.htm
"Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD& Act)". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.fda. gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/FederalFoodDrugandCosmeticActFDCAct/default.htm
"Joint Statement by President Obama and Prime Minister Harper of Canada on Regulatory Cooperation | The White House". Whitehouse.gov. February 4, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2011. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/04/joint-statement-president-obama -and-prime-minister-harper-canada-regul-0
"PM and U.S. President Obama announce shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness between Canada and the United States – Prime Minister of Canada". Pm.gc.ca. February 4, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2011. http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=3931
"United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action Plan: Developing and implementing the Joint Action Plan". Washington, D.C.: Office of the Prime Minister of Canada. December 7, 2011. pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=4511
"Notice: Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Over-the-Counter (OTC) Products: Common Monograph Working Group: Selection of a Monograph for Alignment". Canada's Action Plan. Government of Canada. January 10, 2013. Retrieved February 15, 2013. http://actionplan.gc. ca/en/page/rcc-ccr/notice-regulatory-cooperation-council-rcc-over
"New Drug Application (NDA)". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved November 20,2012. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/Appro valApplications/NewDrugApplicationNDA/
21 CFR 202: Prescription Drug Advertising.
21 CFR 314.80: Postmarketing Reporting of Adverse Drug Experiences
MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program. Accessed October 9, 2007 http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/default.htm
Cohen, Lynne. "Government Policies and Programs – United States – Generic Drug Scandal." The New Book of Knowledge – Medicine And Health. 1990. 276–81. ISBN 0-7172-8244-9.
"Therapeutic Equivalence of Generic Drugs". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 1998. Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsar eDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/AbbreviatedNewDrugApplicationANDAGenerics/ucm0 73182.htm
"F.D.A. Details Problems at Drug Makers". The New York Times. September 12, 1989. http:// www.nytimes.com/1989/09/12/business/fda-details-problems-at-drug-makers.html?pagewanted=2
Regulation of Nonprescription Drug Products FDA. Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www. fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDER/UCM14 8055.pdf
"FDA CDER Handbook: Over-the-Counter Drug Products". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved October 9, 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20090512224542/http:/www.fda. gov/cder/handbook/otcintro.htm
Kliff, Sarah. "The FDA recently halted trials on a potential Ebola treatment". www.vox.com. Vox Media. Retrieved 4 August 2014. http://www.vox.com/2014/8/3/5962381/ebola-outbreak-vacc ine-fda-halted-trials
FDA/CBER – About CBER Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffic es/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CBER/default.htm
CDRH Mission, Vision and Shared Values Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www.fda.gov/About FDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDRH/ucm300639.htm
"What does it mean when FDA "clears" or "approves" a medical device?". Retrieved 14 March 2015. www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Transparency/Basics/ucm194460.htm
FDA Approved Coatings vs. FDA Acceptable Coatings - DECC Company - DECC Company. Decc.com. Retrieved on 2013-10-23. http://www.decc.com/fda-acceptable-vs-fda-approved.php
Ross G (2006). "A perspective on the safety of cosmetic products: a position paper of the American Council on Science and Health". Int. J. Toxicol. 25 (4): 269–77. doi:10.1080/10915 810600746049. PMID 16815815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F10915810600746049
Does FDA have the authority to regulate tobacco products? Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Transparency/Basics/ucm194423.htm
"Cigarette Makers, FDA Clash Over New Graphic Ads". Fox News. September 22, 2011. http:// www.foxnews.com/health/2011/09/22/cigarette-makers-fda-clash-over-new-graphic-ads/#ixzz1Ym nDjVAP
"Overview: Cigarette Health Warnings". FDA. Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www.fda.gov /TobaccoProducts/Labeling/ucm259214.htm
Koppel, Nathan (September 12, 2011). "FDA Defends New Graphic Cigarette Labels". The Wall Street Journal. http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/09/12/fda-defends-new-graphic-cigarette-lab els/
"Big Tobacco Gets Top First Amendment Lawyer for New Suit". AdWeek. Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/big-tobacco-gets-top-first-amendment -lawyer-new-suit-134200
"Tobacco Cos. Get Allies in Warning Label Fight". Convenience Store News. Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.csnews.com/product-categories/tobacco/tobacco-cos-get-allies-warni ng-label-fight
Esterl, Mike (November 8, 2011). "Judge Temporarily Blocks Graphic Cigarette Labels". The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240529702045542045770240402404 67970.html
"About Science & Research at FDA". United States Food and Drug Administration. June 18, 2009. Retrieved November 25, 2011. http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/AboutScienceResearc hatFDA/
"FDA History - Part I". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WhatWeDo/ History/Origin/ucm054819.htm
Original Text of the 1906 Food and Drugs Act and Amendments http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws /wileyact.htm
Milestones in U.S. Food and Drug Law History http://www.fda.gov/opacom/backgrounders/mil es.html
Hamowy, Ronald (February 2010). "Medical Disasters and the Growth of FDA" (PDF). p. 7. Retrieved September 28, 2011. http://www.independent.org/pdf/policy_reports/2010-02-10- fda.pdf
Report of Congressman Morris Udall on thalidomide and the Kefauver hearings. http://www. library.arizona.edu/exhibits/udall/congrept/87th/620817.html
Temple R (2002). "Policy developments in regulatory approval". Statistics in Medicine 21 (19): 2939–2948. doi:10.1002/sim.1298. PMID 12325110. dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fsim.1298
Frum, David (2000). How We Got Here: The '70s. New York, New York: Basic Books. p. 180. ISBN 0-465-04195-7.
Karki L (2005). "Review of FDA Law Related to Pharmaceuticals: The Hatch-Waxman Act, Regu- latory Amendments and Implications for Drug Patent Enforcement". Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society 87: 602–620.
"ACT UP/NY Chronology 1988". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.actupny.org/documents/cro n-88.html
"FDA Website: Expanded Access and Expedited Approval of New Therapies Related to HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on November 1, 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20131101115339 /http:/www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ByAudience/ForPatientAdvocates/SpeedingAccesstoImportantNew Therapies/ucm181838.htm
"FDA report on accelerated approval process". Archived from the original on May 25, 2009. https://web.archive.org/web/20090525082655/http:/www.fda.gov/fdac/special/newdrug/speedin g.html
"Medicinal Marijuana: A Patient-Driven Phenomenon". NPR.org. 14 June 2010. Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=127773447
"The Rise and Fall of Laetrile". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.quackwatch.com/01Quack eryRelatedTopics/Cancer/laetrile.html
Innovation or Stagnation: Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products FDA. Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics /CriticalPathInitiative/CriticalPathOpportunitiesReports/ucm077262.htm
Abigail Alliance Citizen Petition to FDA PDF (119 KB) http://www.abigail-alliance.org/WLF _FDA.pdf
"Free To Choose Medicine: How Faster Access to New Drugs Would Save Countless Lives and End Needless Suffering: Bartley J. Madden: 9781934791325: Amazon.com: Books". Retrieved 14 March 2015. www.amazon.com/Free-Choose-Medicine-Countless-Suffering/dp/1934791326
Boldrin, Michele; Swamidass, S. Joshua (July 25, 2011). "A New Bargain for Drug Approvals". The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230381210457644161 0360466984.html
Bresalier RS et al. "Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal ade. .. - PubMed - NCBI". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15713943
David Graham's 2004 testimony to Congress PDF (28.3 KB) Retrieved August 30, 2012. http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/111804dgtest.pdf
Henderson, Diedtra (September 23, 2006). "Panel: FDA needs more power, funds". Boston Globe. Webcitation.org http://www.webcitation.org/5NkCrjdpd
Books.nap.edu Executive Summary of the 2006 IOM Report The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record _id=11750&page=205
"Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) of 2007". Retrieved 14 March 2015. www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/advance/fdaaa.html
Qato DM, Alexander GC (2011). "Post-Marketing Drug Safety and the Food and Drug Administra tion's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies". JAMA 306 (14): 1595–1596. doi:10.1001 /jama.2011.1457. PMID 21990303. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1104484
Politis P (2005). "Transition From the Carrot to the Stick: The Evolution of Pharmaceutical Regulations Concerning Pediatric Drug Testing". Widener Law Review 12: 271.
"To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the licensing of comparable and interchangeable biological products, and for other purposes. (2007; 110th Congress H.R. 1038) - GovTrack.us". GovTrack.us. Retrieved 14 March 2015. https://www.govtrack.us/congre ss/bills/110/hr1038
"Mobile Medical Applications". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevice s/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ConnectedHealth/MobileMedicalApplications/ucm255978.htm
Yetisen A. K., Martinez-Hurtado J. L. et al. (2014). "The regulation of mobile medical applications". Lab on a Chip 14 (5): 833–840. doi:10.1039/C3LC51235E. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1039%2FC3LC51235E
Henderson, Diedtra (September 23, 2006). Panel: FDA needs more power, funds. Boston Globe. Webcitation.org http://www.webcitation.org/5NkCrjdpd
Committee on the Assessment of the US Drug Safety System. (2006). The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public. Institute of Medicine. Free full-text. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11750#toc
Mundy A, Favole JA (January 8, 2009). "FDA Scientists Ask Obama to Restructure Drug Agency". Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123142562104564381.html
Williams, Richard, Robert Scharff, and David Bieler (February 2010). "Food Safety in the 21st Century". Mercatus On Policy. p. 71.
"JAMA Network - JAMA Internal Medicine - Medical Device Recalls and the FDA Approval Process". Retrieved 14 March 2015. http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articl eid=227466
Givel, Michael (December 2005). "Philip Morris' FDA Gambit: Good for Public Health?" Journal of Public Health Policy (26): pp. 450–468
Henninger, Daniel (2002). "Drug Lag". In David R. Henderson (ed.). Concise Encyclopedia of Economics (1st ed.). Library of Economics and Liberty. OCLC 317650570, 50016270 and 163149563. http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/DrugLag.html
Hilts, Philip J. (2003). Protecting America's Health: The FDA, Business, and One Hundred Years of Regulation. New York: Alfred E. Knopf. ISBN 0-375-40466-X. http://en.Wikipedia. org/wiki/Special:BookSources/037540466X
Madden, Bartley (2010) Free To Choose Medicine: How Faster Access to New Drugs Would Save Countless Lives and End Needless Suffering Chicago: The Heartland Institute. ISBN 978-1-9 34791-32-5. en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781934791325
Moore, Thomas J. (1998). Prescription for Disaster: The Hidden Dangers in Your Medicine Cabinet. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-82998-3. http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Sp ecial:BookSources/0684829983
Kevin Fain, Matthew Daubresse, G. Caleb Alexander (2013). "The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act and Postmarketing Commitments." "JAMA" 310(2): 202-204 doi:10.1001/jama. 2013.7900.
"Employee Profile at the FCC". FCC. 30 Jul 2013. Retrieved 31 Dec 2014. http://www.fcc.go v/encyclopedia/employee-profile-fcc
2012 Budget Estimate FCC Budget Estimates. FCC. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/at tachmatch/DOC-304636A1.pdf
Cecilia Kang (31 October 2011). "Obama names FCC commissioners, both agency, Hill veterans". The Washington Post; Post Tech. Retrieved 1 November 2011. http://www.washingtonpost.com/b logs/post-tech/post/obama-names-democrats-rosenworcel-gops-pai-to-fcc/2011/10/31/gIQAKG5ra M_blog.html?wpisrc=nl_tech
"2008 Performance and Accountability Report" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. September 2008. http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/ar2008.pdf
"FCC Commissioners". FCC. Retrieved 18 July 2007. www.fcc.gov/commissioners/
"FCC Bureaus & Offices". Retrieved June 6, 2013. http://www.fcc.gov/bureaus-offices
Boddy, William. Fifties Television: the Industry and Its Critics. University of Illinois Press, 1992. ISBN 978-0-252-06299-5 http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978 0252062995
Clarke Ingram, "The DuMont Television Network: Historical Web Site". Retrieved 2009-02-01. www.dumonthistory.tv/6.html
http://www.southplainscollege.edu/dub/postfreeze.htm Douglas Gomery, "Television Sweeps the Nation: The Story Behind the Pioneering Post-"Freeze" Stations". From the W. D. "Dub" Rogers, Jr. Television Collection at South Plains College. Retrieved 2008-06-21. http:// www.southplainscollege.edu/dub/postfreeze.htm
"Local Community Radio Act of 2009". Govtrack.us. 2009-10-29. http://www.govtrack.us/con gress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1147
FCC Oversight Hearing (September 17, 2009). "FCC: Unanimous, bipartisan support for LPFM". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ4TC9Aqjfc
Rachel M. Stilwell, "Which Public - Whose Interest - How the FCC's Deregulation of Radio Station Ownership Has Harmed the Public Interest, and How We Can Escape from the Swamp," 26 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 369, Mar. 1, 2006.
David Oxenford Broadcast Law Blog, "On the 15th Anniversary of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, The Effect on Broadcasters is Still Debated," Feb. 9 2011, available at: http: //www.broadcastlawblog.com/2011/02/articles/on-the-15th-anniversary-of-the-telecommunica tions-act-of-1996-the-effect-on-broadcasters-is-still-debated/
Ahrens, Frank (2006-06-08). "The Price for On-Air Indecency Goes Up". The Washington Post. Retrieved 27 June 2009. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/07/ AR2006060700287.html
"Bill Number S. 193". Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005 (Introduced in Senate) from Congressional THOMAS DB. Retrieved 11 April 2005. http://www.congress.org/congressorg /bill.xc?billnum=S.193&congress=109
Commissioners from 1934 to Present FCC http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/commish-list.html
ASR Registration Search. Retrieved 4 November 2009. http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/Asr Search/asrRegistrationSearch.jsp
Fifth Review of the Radio Industry, FCC Media Bureau, undated. http://www.stopbigmedia. com/files/radio_ownership.pdf
John Dunbar, "Lawyer says FCC ordered study destroyed", Associated Press, 2006-09-14. htt p://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0915-01.htm
FCC Refuses to Investigate NSA Program, Predicting Likely Administration Road Blocks Edward J. Markey. May 23, 2006. http://web.archive.org/web/20060601030114/http:/markey.ho use.gov/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=1610&Itemid=125
Ferris, David (2006-10-20). "publish.nyc.indymedia.org | FCC Town Hall Meeting Marked by Concerns over Media Consolidation". Nyc.indymedia.org. Retrieved 4 March 2012. http://nyc .indymedia.org/en/2006/10/77496.html
Obama's Diversity Offensive Against Talk Radio August 30, 2009 By Christopher Ruddy. www.newsmax.com/ruddy/obama_talk_radio/2009/08/30/253646.html
Olga Kharif (October 15, 2008). "FCC's Kevin Martin Supports Freeing White Spaces". Business Week. Retrieved 15 October 2008. http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/ 2008/10/fccs_kevin_mart.html
David Gonzalez (October 15, 2008). "FCC Chairman Kevin Martin wants to allow the use of portable devices on white spaces". UnWiredView.com. Retrieved 15 October 2008. http:// www.unwiredview.com/2008/10/15/fcc-chairman-kevin-martin-wants-to-allow-the-use-of-porta ble-devices-on-white-spaces/
Marguerite Reardon (November 4, 2008). "FCC opens free 'white space' spectrum". CNET. Retrieved 5 November 2008. news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10082505-94.html
FCC opens up wireless 'white spaces;' Assessing winners, losers and wild-cards November 5, 2008. http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=10688&tag=nl.e550
The FCC Doesn't Need to Be by Peter Suderman, Reason http://reason.com/archives/2010/04/ 05/the-fcc-doesnt-need-to-be
Hansell, Saul (2008-08-02). "F.C.C. Vote Sets Precedent on Unfettered Web Usage". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/02/technology/02fcc.html
Wyatt, Edward (November 10, 2014). "Obama Asks F.C.C. to Adopt Tough Net Neutrality Rules". New York Times. Retrieved November 15, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/technology /obama-net-neutrality-fcc.html
NYT Editorial Board (November 14, 2014). "Why the F.C.C. Should Heed President Obama on Internet Regulation". New York Times. Retrieved November 15, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com /2014/11/15/opinion/why-the-fcc-should-heed-president-obama-on-internet-regulations.html
Sepulveda, Ambassador Daniel A. (January 21, 2015). "The World Is Watching Our Net Neutrality Debate, So Let’s Get It Right". Wired (website). Retrieved January 20, 2015.
Weisman, Jonathan (January 19, 2015). "Shifting Politics of Net Neutrality Debate Ahead of F.C.C.Vote". New York Times. Retrieved January 20, 2015. http://www.wired.com/2015/01/on- net-nuetrality-internet-freedom/
Staff (January 16, 2015). "H. R. _ 114th Congress, 1st Session [Discussion Draft] - To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to ensure Internet openness..." (PDF). U. S. Congress. Retrieved January 20, 2015. http://energycommerce.house.gov/sites/republicans.energycomm erce.house.gov/files/114/BILLS-114hr-PIH-OpenInternet.pdf
Lohr, Steve (February 2, 2015). "In Net Neutrality Push, F.C.C. Is Expected to Propose Regulating Internet Service as a Utility". New York Times. Retrieved February 2, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/technology/in-net-neutrality-push-fcc-is-expected-to- propose-regulating-the-internet-as-a-utility.html
Lohr, Steve (February 2, 2015). "F.C.C. Chief Wants to Override State Laws Curbing Community Net Services". New York Times. Retrieved February 2, 2015. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/ 2015/02/02/f-c-c-chief-wants-to-override-state-laws-curbing-community-net-services/
Flaherty, Anne (January 31, 2015). "Just whose Internet is it? New federal rules may answer that". AP News. Retrieved January 31, 2015. http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150131/us-- net_neutrality-news_guide-c235cbd2b9.html
Fung, Brian (January 2, 2015). "Get ready: The FCC says it will vote on net neutrality in February". Washington Post. Retrieved January 2, 2015. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/01/02/get-ready-the-fcc-says-itll-vote-on-net-neutrality-in-february /
Staff (January 2, 2015). "FCC to vote next month on net neutrality rules". AP News. Retrieved January 2, 2015. http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150103/us-fcc-net-neutrality -d8f89ffc53.html
Lohr, Steve (February 4, 2015). "F.C.C. Plans Strong Hand to Regulate the Internet". New York Times. Retrieved February 5, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/05/technology/fcc -wheeler-net-neutrality.html
Wheeler, Tom (February 4, 2015). "FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler: This Is How We Will Ensure Net Neutrality". Wired (magazine). Retrieved February 5, 2015. http://www.wired.com/2015/02/fcc -chairman-wheeler-net-neutrality
The Editorial Board (February 6, 2015). "Courage and Good Sense at the F.C.C. - Net Neutrality's Wise New Rules". New York Times. Retrieved February 6, 2015. http://www.nytimes .com/2015/02/06/opinion/net-neutralitys-wise-new-rules.html
Weisman, Jonathan (February 24, 2015). "As Republicans Concede, F.C.C. Is Expected to Enforce Net Neutrality". New York Times. Retrieved February 24, 2015. http://www.nytimes. com/2015/02/25/technology/path-clears-for-net-neutrality-ahead-of-fcc-vote.html
Lohr, Steve (February 25, 2015). "The Push for Net Neutrality Arose From Lack of Choice". New York Times. Retrieved February 25, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/26/technology/ limited-high-speed-internet-choices-underlie-net-neutrality-rules.html
Staff (February 26, 2015). "FCC Adopts Strong, Sustainable Rules To Protect The Open Internet" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. Retrieved February 26, 2015. http:// transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0226/DOC-332260A1.pdf
Ruiz, Rebecca R.; Lohr, Steve (February 26, 2015). "In Net Neutrality Victory, F.C.C. Classifies Broadband Internet Service as a Public Utility". New York Times. Retrieved February 26, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/27/technology/net-neutrality-fcc-vote- internet-utility.html
Flaherty, Anne (February 25, 2015). "FACT CHECK: Talking heads skew 'net neutrality' debate" .AP News. Retrieved February 26, 2015. http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150225/us--net_ neutrality-fact_check-e30cfb560f.html
Liebelson, Dana (February 26, 2015). "Net Neutrality Prevails In Historic FCC Vote". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 27, 2015. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/26/net- neutrality-fcc-vote_n_6761702.html
Ehrenfreund, Max. "New poll: Republicans and Democrats both overwhelmingly support net neutrality". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/11/12 /wonkbook-polling-shows-even-republicans-overwhelmingly-support-net-neutrality/
Ruiz, Rebecca R. (March 12, 2015). "F.C.C. Sets Net Neutrality Rules". New York Times. Retrieved March 13, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/13/technology/fcc-releases-net -neutrality-rules.html
Sommer, Jeff (March 12, 2015). "What the Net Neutrality Rules Say". New York Times. Retrieved March 13, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/03/12/technology/net- neutrality-rules-explained.html
FCC Staff (March 12, 2015). "Federal Communications Commission - FCC 15-24 - In the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet - GN Docket No. 14-28 - Report and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. Retrieved March 13, 2015. http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15 -24A1.pdf
Reisinger, Don (April 13, 2015). "Net neutrality rules get published -- let the lawsuits begin". CNET. Retrieved April 13, 2015. http://www.cnet.com/news/fccs-net-neutrality-rules- hit-federal-register-lawsuit-underway/
Federal Communications Commission (April 13, 2015). "Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet - A Rule by the Federal Communications Commission on 04/13/2015". Federal Register. Retrieved April 13, 2015. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/04/13/2015-07841/ protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet
Stimson, Leslie (6 November 2013). "IBiquity Illuminates License Fees". Radio World. Retrieved 11 November 2013. http://www.radioworld.com/article/ibiquity-illuminates-license -fees/222209
Greer, Clarke; Ferguson, Douglas (2008). "Factors Influencing the Adoption of HD Radio by Local Radio Station Managers". The International Journal on Media Management. doi:10.1080/ 14241270802426725. Retrieved 11 November 2013. http://www.mediajournal.org/ojs/index.php/jmm /article/viewArticle/90
McCullagh D (2008-11-07) Democratic win could herald wireless Net neutrality. CNET, viewed 2010-06-01. news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10085047-38.html
Brodkin, Jon (20 September 2013). "Verizon blocks Nexus 7 and will probably get away with it". Ars Technica. Retrieved 11 November 2013. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/09/ verizon-blocks-nexus-7-and-will-probably-get-away-with-it/
"FCC's CIO started young". FCW.com. Retrieved May 2014. http://fcw.com/articles/2013/11/08/ fcc-cio-david-bray.aspx
"FCC Names New CIO and Acting Director". FedScoop Magazine. Retrieved September 2013. http: //fedscoop.com/fcc-names-new-cio-and-acting-managing-director/
"The Top 70 Most Social U.S. Federal Technology Pros On Twitter". huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved February 2014. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vala-afshar/the-top-70-us-federal-tec_ b_4531172.html
"David Bray, CIO, Federal Communications Commission". FCC.gov. Retrieved February 2014. http://cxo-talk.com/david-bray-cio-federal-communications-commission/
"Public Service Leadership and Civic Innovation in a Ubiquitous Internet Era". Oxford Internet Institute. Retrieved November 2013. http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/events/?id=641
"FCC CIO David Bray on emerging tech trends". FedScoop. Retrieved February 2014. http://www. youtube.com/watch?v=2Pi8AS-p0oU
"Federal Communications Commission, Our Work". Federal Commissions Commission. Retrieved July 2013. www.fcc.gov/our-work
"On the Importance of Communication". Federal Communications Commission. Retrieved October 2013. http://www.fcc.gov/blog/importance-communication
Obar, Jonathan, A.; Schejter, A.M. (2010). "Inclusion or illusion? An analysis of the FCC’s". Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 54 (2): 212–227. doi:10.1080/08838151003735000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F08838151003735000
"Legal Websites and Information". Federal Communications Commission. Retrieved 3 March 2014. https://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/legal-websites-and-information
"Federal Communications Commission Record". University of North Texas Libraries. Retrieved 3 March 2014. http://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/FCCRD/
Moss, D.A.; Lackow, J.B. "Rethinking the role of history in law & economics: the case of the Federal Radio Commission in 1927 (working paper)". http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=1220743
Mazzocco, D. "Radio’s New Deal: The NRA and U.S. Broadcasting, 1933–1935". Journal of Radio Studies 12 (1): 32–46. doi:10.1207/s15506843jrs1201_4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207%2Fs1550684 3jrs1201_4
Risley, F. (1995). "A First Step: The FCC’s Investigation Into Newspaper Ownership of Radio Stations". Journal of Radio Studies 3: 118–129. doi:10.1080/19376529509361978. http://dx. doi.org/10.1080%2F19376529509361978
Slotten, H. (2000). Radio and Television Regulation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Barrow, R (1957). "Network Broadcasting – The Report of the FCC Network Study Staff". Law and Contemporary Problems 22: 611–625.
Minow, N (2003). "Television and the Public Interest". Federal Communications Law Journal 55: 395–406.
Copps, M. "Statement of Commissioner Michael J. Copps dissenting" (PDF). Retrieved July 14, 2010. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235047A9.pdf
McConnell, B. "November 5, 2002". Broadcasting and Cable. http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/ Broadcasting_and_Cable
Editorial (December 9, 2002). "Onward to Richmond". Broadcasting & Cable.
FCC Ends Long Fight, Will Move to Southwest D.C. The Washington Post. January 24, 1996. Financial F01. Retrieved 5 March 2010. http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/ 21835960.html?dids=21835960:21835960&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+24,+1996& author=Maryann+Haggerty&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=FCC+Ends+ Long+Fight,+Will+Move+to+Southwest+D.C.&pqatl=google